Jul 8, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussions
Religion
Seeing that homosexuality doesn't hurt anybody, how can it then be morally wrong?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheJoyousHedonist" data-source="post: 2414944" data-attributes="member: 829426"><p>Since (psychologically healthy) humans have a drive towards happiness and any ethical concept based on anything but pleasure and pain and sustainable happiness is superfluous, I cannot comprehend why homosexuality would be morally wrong if it doesn't have any negative effects on anybody. </p><p></p><p>Can somebody explain to me why homosexuality would be wrong if it doesn't have any negative effects whatsoever to either the people exercising it or anybody else in society?</p><p></p><p>(Just don't say it isn't natural, because homosexuality is common in the animal kingdom. Personally I wouldn't even say that ''it's unnatural'' is a valid argument in any context.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheJoyousHedonist, post: 2414944, member: 829426"] Since (psychologically healthy) humans have a drive towards happiness and any ethical concept based on anything but pleasure and pain and sustainable happiness is superfluous, I cannot comprehend why homosexuality would be morally wrong if it doesn't have any negative effects on anybody. Can somebody explain to me why homosexuality would be wrong if it doesn't have any negative effects whatsoever to either the people exercising it or anybody else in society? (Just don't say it isn't natural, because homosexuality is common in the animal kingdom. Personally I wouldn't even say that ''it's unnatural'' is a valid argument in any context.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top