Jun 17, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Rant-Whine-Complain-Vent
so i'm arguing with this guy about carbon dating?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="pliqht" data-source="post: 2254117" data-attributes="member: 694301"><p>and he said</p><p>"carbon 14 dating isn't accurate unless it is within 4000 years, because there aren't any trees over 4000 years old"</p><p>am i missing something? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f635.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt="o_O" title="Er... what? o_O" data-smilie="12"data-shortname="o_O" /></p><p>yeah... i said it was ~60k yrs and he said 4k b/c of that and i was like...what?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="pliqht, post: 2254117, member: 694301"] and he said "carbon 14 dating isn't accurate unless it is within 4000 years, because there aren't any trees over 4000 years old" am i missing something? o_O yeah... i said it was ~60k yrs and he said 4k b/c of that and i was like...what? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top