Jun 17, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OnTopic Community
Predictions and Prophecies
So... what predictions does intelligent design "science" make?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TerrytheKlown" data-source="post: 1970233" data-attributes="member: 428739"><p>I think everyone has heard this one: A tornado sweeping through a junkyard isn't going to assemble a 747.</p><p></p><p>Which is wrong on so many levels, I don't even know where to begin.</p><p></p><p>Of course, everybody knows that ID is just creationism dressed up in a cheap tux. Intelligent Design sounds just that much more credible than creationism.</p><p>And of course since ID is just creationism, what predictions can you possibly have? None, just a bunch of fallacious bible prophecies.</p><p></p><p>On a side note: Maybe you know this already, Fred Hoyle, the genius who came up with the whole 747 'prediction', also attempted to dismiss Archaeopteryx as a hoax.</p><p></p><p>Furthermore, 'Intelligent Design' is hardly the right term to describe what we see in nature.</p><p>How does a creationist account for the fact that over 99% of all species that have ever lived on this Earth are now extinct? Not to mention the number of extinct species increase everyday. This of course is where the 'Stupid Design' theory comes into mind, but let's all try to be serious here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TerrytheKlown, post: 1970233, member: 428739"] I think everyone has heard this one: A tornado sweeping through a junkyard isn't going to assemble a 747. Which is wrong on so many levels, I don't even know where to begin. Of course, everybody knows that ID is just creationism dressed up in a cheap tux. Intelligent Design sounds just that much more credible than creationism. And of course since ID is just creationism, what predictions can you possibly have? None, just a bunch of fallacious bible prophecies. On a side note: Maybe you know this already, Fred Hoyle, the genius who came up with the whole 747 'prediction', also attempted to dismiss Archaeopteryx as a hoax. Furthermore, 'Intelligent Design' is hardly the right term to describe what we see in nature. How does a creationist account for the fact that over 99% of all species that have ever lived on this Earth are now extinct? Not to mention the number of extinct species increase everyday. This of course is where the 'Stupid Design' theory comes into mind, but let's all try to be serious here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top