Jun 17, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lifestyle
Sex & Relationships
Stock valuation P/E Vs. Enterprise value to EBITDA, what is the relationship?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="david" data-source="post: 2350955" data-attributes="member: 207029"><p>In the following example we find the price for RCKY to be higher when we use P/E than when we use enterprise value to ebitda. Can some one please explain to me why this is the case? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Problem:</p><p>Suppose Rocky Shoes and Boots (RCKY) has earnings per share of $2.30 and EBITDA of $30.7 million. RCKY also has 5.4 million shares outstanding and debt of $125 million (net of cash.) You believe Deckers Outdoors Corporation is comparable to RCKY in terms of its underlying business, but Deckers has no debt. If Deckers has a P/E of 13.3 and an enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 7.4, estimate the value of RCKY’s shares using both multiples. Which estimate is likely to be more accurate? </p><p></p><p></p><p>Solution:</p><p>Using Decker’s P/E, we would estimate a share price for RCKY of P0 = $2.30 x 13.3 = $30.59. Using the enterprise value to EBITDA multiple, we would estimate RCKY’s enterprise value to be V0 = $30.7 million x 7.4 = $227.2 million. We then subtract debt and divide by the number of shares to estimate RCKY’s share price: P0 = (227.2 – 125)/5.4 = $18.93. Because of the large difference in leverage between the firms we would expect the second estimate which is based on enterprise value to be more reliable. </p><p></p><p>If you could shed any light on the question raised above I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you for your time and consideration.</p><p>-Cheers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="david, post: 2350955, member: 207029"] In the following example we find the price for RCKY to be higher when we use P/E than when we use enterprise value to ebitda. Can some one please explain to me why this is the case? Problem: Suppose Rocky Shoes and Boots (RCKY) has earnings per share of $2.30 and EBITDA of $30.7 million. RCKY also has 5.4 million shares outstanding and debt of $125 million (net of cash.) You believe Deckers Outdoors Corporation is comparable to RCKY in terms of its underlying business, but Deckers has no debt. If Deckers has a P/E of 13.3 and an enterprise value to EBITDA multiple of 7.4, estimate the value of RCKY’s shares using both multiples. Which estimate is likely to be more accurate? Solution: Using Decker’s P/E, we would estimate a share price for RCKY of P0 = $2.30 x 13.3 = $30.59. Using the enterprise value to EBITDA multiple, we would estimate RCKY’s enterprise value to be V0 = $30.7 million x 7.4 = $227.2 million. We then subtract debt and divide by the number of shares to estimate RCKY’s share price: P0 = (227.2 – 125)/5.4 = $18.93. Because of the large difference in leverage between the firms we would expect the second estimate which is based on enterprise value to be more reliable. If you could shed any light on the question raised above I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you for your time and consideration. -Cheers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top