Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="UrpersonalPassion" data-source="post: 3009674" data-attributes="member: 120777">I did overstate my case about their involvement being huge. But they were involved none the less. Their involvement in the slave trade in Surinam was larger than in othe markets. If I remember correctly they accounted for about 10% of the slave trade. So yes they merit a mention. err... no one has parroted anything. I suggest you do your reading. As I said... the Jews were involved in the slave trade. I concede that I overstated my case by using the word &#039;huge&#039;. But they were involved none the less. That fact is irrefutable.Again it&#039;s not untrue. They were involved in the slave trade. It wasn&#039;t perhaps as high a number as other groups... but still enough to be recognized. Why do you have such a problem with that?I challenge you to find any other threads here at MAP where I&#039;ve blamed the Jews for anything. You&#039;re trying to paint it as if I&#039;m some sort of anti-semite who&#039;s constantly pointing my finger at the Jews. That&#039;s simply not the case and you can&#039;t anymore prove it with citations than you can make chalk into cheese.Either put up or shut up.&nbsp; Hmmm... seems this is a case of your own personal issues. I&#039;ve not used any of the language you have to refer to Jews. Nor have ever implied it. So really if you need to sort out your issues.... MAP is not the place to do it.Go back and attempt to understand why my post was responding to. Look at the statement it was responding to. It&#039;s hardly some anti semitic diatribe. Rather it points out that the slave trade was not only a white/black issue. There were others involved. The Jews were involved. Like it or not... you simply can&#039;t refute it.Dude... how dense are you?How poor is your reading comprehension.I didn&#039;t single out the Jews.... look at the friggin&#039; statement... I also mentioned Arabs (but oh we don&#039;t hear you moaning about that do we? no.) and it was mentioned in the context of bigger issue of black/white and the slave trade.The Jews were involved in the slave trader. Period.You&#039;ve said it yourself. I conceded that I overstated my case... but again they were involved.Ok... so if I&#039;d done this more than once... if sooooo many of my posts or threads here at MAP are that blatantly anti-semitic (as you&#039;re asserting)... then it will be no problem for you to qoute/link them and post them in all their terrible antisemite rancor here for everyone to see.... right?&nbsp; Seriously Buckeye Blue... put your money where your mouth is... if not just shut up because you&#039;re talking tripe.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="UrpersonalPassion, post: 3009674, member: 120777"] I did overstate my case about their involvement being huge. But they were involved none the less. Their involvement in the slave trade in Surinam was larger than in othe markets. If I remember correctly they accounted for about 10% of the slave trade. So yes they merit a mention. err... no one has parroted anything. I suggest you do your reading. As I said... the Jews were involved in the slave trade. I concede that I overstated my case by using the word 'huge'. But they were involved none the less. That fact is irrefutable. Again it's not untrue. They were involved in the slave trade. It wasn't perhaps as high a number as other groups... but still enough to be recognized. Why do you have such a problem with that? I challenge you to find any other threads here at MAP where I've blamed the Jews for anything. You're trying to paint it as if I'm some sort of anti-semite who's constantly pointing my finger at the Jews. That's simply not the case and you can't anymore prove it with citations than you can make chalk into cheese. Either put up or shut up. Hmmm... seems this is a case of your own personal issues. I've not used any of the language you have to refer to Jews. Nor have ever implied it. So really if you need to sort out your issues.... MAP is not the place to do it. Go back and attempt to understand why my post was responding to. Look at the statement it was responding to. It's hardly some anti semitic diatribe. Rather it points out that the slave trade was not only a white/black issue. There were others involved. The Jews were involved. Like it or not... you simply can't refute it. Dude... how dense are you? How poor is your reading comprehension. I didn't single out the Jews.... look at the friggin' statement... I also mentioned Arabs (but oh we don't hear you moaning about that do we? no.) and it was mentioned in the context of bigger issue of black/white and the slave trade. The Jews were involved in the slave trader. Period. You've said it yourself. I conceded that I overstated my case... but again they were involved. Ok... so if I'd done this more than once... if sooooo many of my posts or threads here at MAP are that blatantly anti-semitic (as you're asserting)... then it will be no problem for you to qoute/link them and post them in all their terrible antisemite rancor here for everyone to see.... right? Seriously Buckeye Blue... put your money where your mouth is... if not just shut up because you're talking tripe. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…