Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Random Interesting Topics
The HOLOCAUST! Why aren't hostile adherents actually HOPEFUL Bishop
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ehrwachs" data-source="post: 1521378" data-attributes="member: 599918"><p>Williamson's claims turn out to be TRUE? I mean, if it does turn out that only 300,000 Jews were killed or died in the camps, and it does turn out that a mechanised attempt to exterminate them didn't actually occur, then surely that's a good thing? It means LESS suffering, FEWER dead, and altogether a LESS horrendous experience (for the dead, or the survivors)? Not to say it wasn't horrendous, but LESS horrendous is BETTER, surely?</p><p>How come people on here, instead of being hopeful at Williamson's (and others) suggestion, they get HOSTILE? What's that all about? It's like they INSIST it was as bad as previously thought...which I think is bizarre. What do YOU think?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ehrwachs, post: 1521378, member: 599918"] Williamson's claims turn out to be TRUE? I mean, if it does turn out that only 300,000 Jews were killed or died in the camps, and it does turn out that a mechanised attempt to exterminate them didn't actually occur, then surely that's a good thing? It means LESS suffering, FEWER dead, and altogether a LESS horrendous experience (for the dead, or the survivors)? Not to say it wasn't horrendous, but LESS horrendous is BETTER, surely? How come people on here, instead of being hopeful at Williamson's (and others) suggestion, they get HOSTILE? What's that all about? It's like they INSIST it was as bad as previously thought...which I think is bizarre. What do YOU think? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top