Jul 3, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Tottenham Riots
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="casapulla2001" data-source="post: 3210014" data-attributes="member: 117195"><p>I never even attempted to make that argument dude. Just a few post before that one I rubbished that Miliband guys nonsense about the reasons for the riots being "complex". Frankly if he thinks it's "complex", he has no business leading the Labour party. And as for Nick Clegg. Where the hell was he when Cameron was on holiday? Why did he have to wait until Cameron came back before he made an appearance? Now all of a sudden he's all tough talking and condemning the rioters. It's sickening.</p><p></p><p>The political leadership of our country is in a sad state of affairs. All of our current leaders are sad, pathetic, opportunistic, scheming cowards surrounded by suck-ups and yes men.</p><p></p><p>Yes the riots would have taken place anyway. I never said the wouldn't. I said Cameron's attempt to use them for political points scoring and rushing through bad legislation was sickening. And it is sickening. There's even been talk of shutting down social networks during riots. Are they going to shut down the phone networks too and rename the UK as Syria? How about China or Lybia?</p><p></p><p>We're currently engaged in a military campaign against a nutter who feared his peoples ability to talk freely. If they seriously try to introduce legislation that lets social networks be shut down when they're an inconvenience to the government then every service man and woman should resign. Because frankly they're fighting for nothing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="casapulla2001, post: 3210014, member: 117195"] I never even attempted to make that argument dude. Just a few post before that one I rubbished that Miliband guys nonsense about the reasons for the riots being "complex". Frankly if he thinks it's "complex", he has no business leading the Labour party. And as for Nick Clegg. Where the hell was he when Cameron was on holiday? Why did he have to wait until Cameron came back before he made an appearance? Now all of a sudden he's all tough talking and condemning the rioters. It's sickening. The political leadership of our country is in a sad state of affairs. All of our current leaders are sad, pathetic, opportunistic, scheming cowards surrounded by suck-ups and yes men. Yes the riots would have taken place anyway. I never said the wouldn't. I said Cameron's attempt to use them for political points scoring and rushing through bad legislation was sickening. And it is sickening. There's even been talk of shutting down social networks during riots. Are they going to shut down the phone networks too and rename the UK as Syria? How about China or Lybia? We're currently engaged in a military campaign against a nutter who feared his peoples ability to talk freely. If they seriously try to introduce legislation that lets social networks be shut down when they're an inconvenience to the government then every service man and woman should resign. Because frankly they're fighting for nothing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top