Jun 17, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Ultamate Showdown Bear grylls vs Survivor Man
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="3dMaN" data-source="post: 3328734" data-attributes="member: 154434"><p>I would have to say Les Stroud > Bear Grylls. </p><p></p><p>Bear seems to just do stupid things survival wise, and more often than not the risk greatly outweighs the benefits. The benefit to his actions are being able to show the viewer how to get out of those situations. However, in all honesty, who in their right mind would jump into a frozen pond while in a survival situation? And getting stung by a bee and having your face swell up considerably... all for a small chunk of honey comb? </p><p></p><p>Les takes a more cautious and logical approach to filming his show. For one, he goes in with common, everyday items. People were crying about him having a gun in the arctic, but seem to forget that at the very beginning he said the insurance company and/or Discovery wouldn't let him go into the area without a gun... and he never used it. Bear, however, jumps into areas using a parachute... then uses the rope from the parachute? </p><p></p><p>And then when it comes to the all important aspect of finding food, Les takes a much smarter approach to it. For one, he actually cooks his fucking food. Bear just seems to enjoy running around looking for nasty ass shit to eat and make funny faces at the camera. </p><p></p><p>MvW is a fun show to watch, but Survivorman is more interesting.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="3dMaN, post: 3328734, member: 154434"] I would have to say Les Stroud > Bear Grylls. Bear seems to just do stupid things survival wise, and more often than not the risk greatly outweighs the benefits. The benefit to his actions are being able to show the viewer how to get out of those situations. However, in all honesty, who in their right mind would jump into a frozen pond while in a survival situation? And getting stung by a bee and having your face swell up considerably... all for a small chunk of honey comb? Les takes a more cautious and logical approach to filming his show. For one, he goes in with common, everyday items. People were crying about him having a gun in the arctic, but seem to forget that at the very beginning he said the insurance company and/or Discovery wouldn't let him go into the area without a gun... and he never used it. Bear, however, jumps into areas using a parachute... then uses the rope from the parachute? And then when it comes to the all important aspect of finding food, Les takes a much smarter approach to it. For one, he actually cooks his fucking food. Bear just seems to enjoy running around looking for nasty ass shit to eat and make funny faces at the camera. MvW is a fun show to watch, but Survivorman is more interesting. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top