Jul 4, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
unanswerable questions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ReveCleophus" data-source="post: 3134749" data-attributes="member: 123085"><p>Because F=ma, all forces are unstoppable except where the mass of the object it impacts is infinite, at which point you have an object which cannot be affected in any real sense by a force. As such, the chances are that if an unstoppable (i.e. normally finite) force meets an immovable object (i.e. infinite mass), the object will be stationary.</p><p></p><p>However, the logical way to deal with this is to state that in any coupled situation, the existence of an unstoppable force and an immovable object are contradictory and one must take priority over the other.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Travel at light speed for a car would be impossible. However, assuming 99.999% of the speed of light, if you turned on your headlights you would see the light extending ahead of you at the speed of light from your frame of reference. One of the joys of relativity is that light speed is constant in all frames of reference, moving or otherwise.</p><p></p><p>An observer will see a totally different story, however.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ReveCleophus, post: 3134749, member: 123085"] Because F=ma, all forces are unstoppable except where the mass of the object it impacts is infinite, at which point you have an object which cannot be affected in any real sense by a force. As such, the chances are that if an unstoppable (i.e. normally finite) force meets an immovable object (i.e. infinite mass), the object will be stationary. However, the logical way to deal with this is to state that in any coupled situation, the existence of an unstoppable force and an immovable object are contradictory and one must take priority over the other. Travel at light speed for a car would be impossible. However, assuming 99.999% of the speed of light, if you turned on your headlights you would see the light extending ahead of you at the speed of light from your frame of reference. One of the joys of relativity is that light speed is constant in all frames of reference, moving or otherwise. An observer will see a totally different story, however. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top