Jul 4, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Using propaganda.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="teallander" data-source="post: 3119280" data-attributes="member: 130522"><p>old palden if you read his posts it's quite clear that he is saying he only saw the videos recently. It's really not difficult to see that point and I think this highlights how it is certainly worth re-reading posts before accusing someone of lieing for underhand purposes.</p><p></p><p>To highlight how you are jumping to the wrong conclusions...</p><p></p><p>First Sparkle says he has just seen these images recently and subsequently he poses some questions about the reaction seeing such videos would case to the public at large:</p><p></p><p></p><p>Next slip comments that such videos are old news and everyone has already seen them:</p><p></p><p></p><p>After this Sparkle clarifies that he really hadn't seen the videos before and he doesn't agree with slip that most people will have seen them. A point with which I would agree (just for an example none of the 5 twenty somethings in my flat have except for myself):</p><p></p><p></p><p>In light of the above I would suggest you apologise to Sparkle for not reading the thread properly or at very least just read threads more carefully before making accusations and implying that such lies are at the heart of the worlds problems. I would contend that jumping to conclusions without taking the time to really look at issues is certainly just as problematic.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="teallander, post: 3119280, member: 130522"] old palden if you read his posts it's quite clear that he is saying he only saw the videos recently. It's really not difficult to see that point and I think this highlights how it is certainly worth re-reading posts before accusing someone of lieing for underhand purposes. To highlight how you are jumping to the wrong conclusions... First Sparkle says he has just seen these images recently and subsequently he poses some questions about the reaction seeing such videos would case to the public at large: Next slip comments that such videos are old news and everyone has already seen them: After this Sparkle clarifies that he really hadn't seen the videos before and he doesn't agree with slip that most people will have seen them. A point with which I would agree (just for an example none of the 5 twenty somethings in my flat have except for myself): In light of the above I would suggest you apologise to Sparkle for not reading the thread properly or at very least just read threads more carefully before making accusations and implying that such lies are at the heart of the worlds problems. I would contend that jumping to conclusions without taking the time to really look at issues is certainly just as problematic. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top