Jul 4, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Using propaganda.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yumi" data-source="post: 3119328" data-attributes="member: 91743"><p>No, no, no; not 'dishonest' as in 'you're a lier' but intellectually dishonest meaning you're viewpoints are inconsistent despite the similar situational circumstances and the preponderance of evidence. However, if you truly didn't know all that stuff about Saddam, I can't but help but ask: how are you sure your anti-war stance is based on facts and not anti-war propaganda? Clearly you either didn't have the information or decided to look the other way. If you don't know about the 1998 law, or the UN resolution violations, or even the 1998 bombing campaign, how do you know the conclusions you've reached about the war take into consideration all the facts? If you didn't know that other stuff, what else are you possibly ill-informed about? If you really didn't know, jumping up and down about how 'unjust' the war is makes you look like all you can do is parrot others. How can you be sure it really is 'unjust' when you clearly don't have all the facts?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yumi, post: 3119328, member: 91743"] No, no, no; not 'dishonest' as in 'you're a lier' but intellectually dishonest meaning you're viewpoints are inconsistent despite the similar situational circumstances and the preponderance of evidence. However, if you truly didn't know all that stuff about Saddam, I can't but help but ask: how are you sure your anti-war stance is based on facts and not anti-war propaganda? Clearly you either didn't have the information or decided to look the other way. If you don't know about the 1998 law, or the UN resolution violations, or even the 1998 bombing campaign, how do you know the conclusions you've reached about the war take into consideration all the facts? If you didn't know that other stuff, what else are you possibly ill-informed about? If you really didn't know, jumping up and down about how 'unjust' the war is makes you look like all you can do is parrot others. How can you be sure it really is 'unjust' when you clearly don't have all the facts? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top