Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Mobile
Carriers
Rogers
What was up with that horrible LBW decision against Rogers?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Lomax" data-source="post: 2774087" data-attributes="member: 393368"><p>It was such a bizarre delivery that it caught everyone - batsman, bowler, umpire, TMS commentators - by surprise. With the benefit of replays, it was shown to be a bad decision, but that benefit is not available to the umpires.</p><p></p><p>Terrible umpiring? No umpire is perfect, or ever will be. If an umpire gets nine decisions right out of ten - as is happeneing in this series, despite the controversies some are stirring up - that's actually quite good umpiring.</p><p></p><p>As for reviewing: Australia keep wasting their reviews on hopeless causes, causing them to run out, and not have them available when they really need them. Watson had just wasted one - and Rogers was so astonished by what happened to him, he didn't dare risk wasting the second (although it later WAS wasted).</p><p></p><p>Using DRS tactically is - for better or worse - another skill that teams must learn.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Lomax, post: 2774087, member: 393368"] It was such a bizarre delivery that it caught everyone - batsman, bowler, umpire, TMS commentators - by surprise. With the benefit of replays, it was shown to be a bad decision, but that benefit is not available to the umpires. Terrible umpiring? No umpire is perfect, or ever will be. If an umpire gets nine decisions right out of ten - as is happeneing in this series, despite the controversies some are stirring up - that's actually quite good umpiring. As for reviewing: Australia keep wasting their reviews on hopeless causes, causing them to run out, and not have them available when they really need them. Watson had just wasted one - and Rogers was so astonished by what happened to him, he didn't dare risk wasting the second (although it later WAS wasted). Using DRS tactically is - for better or worse - another skill that teams must learn. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top