Jun 18, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Rant-Whine-Complain-Vent
What's the point of having pedestrian only bridges? plus rant on eco-warriors?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Iskandar" data-source="post: 1501362" data-attributes="member: 262086"><p>In cities built on rivers?</p><p></p><p>Wouldn't it be far more cost effective to just make the bridge twice as wide and open the bridge to traffic as well, instead of having to make an entirely new bridge for traffic?</p><p></p><p>Where I live, we have all the greenies that always want to build these things.</p><p></p><p>They are the same people that say that only buses should be allowed in the CBD, not cars.</p><p></p><p>These people are more eco-warriors than they are driven by economics. Why do we listen to them? They shouldn't be allowed have their opinion taken seriously.</p><p>We have about 6 major bridges and only three of them are open to traffic....</p><p></p><p>Two are pedestrian only</p><p>One is buses and pedestrian only</p><p>Plus a seventh which has only rail.</p><p></p><p>I am all for public transport, around 25% of the people here catch public transport on a daily basis, I take the train everyday, but this is just a joke.</p><p></p><p>Things should only be done to make money, not solely save the environment. Can't we save the environment and make money without wasting millions of dollars on a useless bridge that is only used on weekends?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Iskandar, post: 1501362, member: 262086"] In cities built on rivers? Wouldn't it be far more cost effective to just make the bridge twice as wide and open the bridge to traffic as well, instead of having to make an entirely new bridge for traffic? Where I live, we have all the greenies that always want to build these things. They are the same people that say that only buses should be allowed in the CBD, not cars. These people are more eco-warriors than they are driven by economics. Why do we listen to them? They shouldn't be allowed have their opinion taken seriously. We have about 6 major bridges and only three of them are open to traffic.... Two are pedestrian only One is buses and pedestrian only Plus a seventh which has only rail. I am all for public transport, around 25% of the people here catch public transport on a daily basis, I take the train everyday, but this is just a joke. Things should only be done to make money, not solely save the environment. Can't we save the environment and make money without wasting millions of dollars on a useless bridge that is only used on weekends? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top