Jul 8, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Mobile
Carriers
Rogers
who was a better runner in their prime? Alan webb or Roger Bannister?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="George" data-source="post: 2779067" data-attributes="member: 210326"><p>Now their both obviously out of their top prime, Alan is just out of his. He still runs but doesn't do as well</p><p>Why are you morons degrading Bannister? Didn't you forget that he ran the very first sub four minute mile in history? He's the Thomas Jefferson of running you idiots! He never suffered any injuries like Alan Webb and he never struggled in his career and I'm sure if he really wanted to he could've gotten an even faster time. Lets see you morons run 3:59, or even 4:59 for that matter</p><p>And Alan webb may have ran faster times but he also went through major ups and downs in his career and is in a major down and has been for years. He's been injured and sick. I wasn't asking for a direct answer, I was asking for opinion. There's a difference. Bannisters success was consistent and he had a big life that running was only a part of. Alan Webb lets the bad performances drag him down. Just saying</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="George, post: 2779067, member: 210326"] Now their both obviously out of their top prime, Alan is just out of his. He still runs but doesn't do as well Why are you morons degrading Bannister? Didn't you forget that he ran the very first sub four minute mile in history? He's the Thomas Jefferson of running you idiots! He never suffered any injuries like Alan Webb and he never struggled in his career and I'm sure if he really wanted to he could've gotten an even faster time. Lets see you morons run 3:59, or even 4:59 for that matter And Alan webb may have ran faster times but he also went through major ups and downs in his career and is in a major down and has been for years. He's been injured and sick. I wasn't asking for a direct answer, I was asking for opinion. There's a difference. Bannisters success was consistent and he had a big life that running was only a part of. Alan Webb lets the bad performances drag him down. Just saying [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top