Jul 5, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OnTopic Community
Sports Club
Why do most ppl on here keep on talking about Taker's streak?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="TheHorrorlisa" data-source="post: 1543621" data-attributes="member: 606688"><p>basically to me ending taker's streak is one of the most stupid things the WWE could do, even if he was helping younger talent that would just destroy his legacy, imagine a sign with </p><p></p><p>19-1 which one is better that or this 20-0?</p><p></p><p>his streak is his legacy, he doesnt get as many title shots as mcmahon's son in law gets, the least they could do is give him a wrestlemania undefeated streak.....</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="TheHorrorlisa, post: 1543621, member: 606688"] basically to me ending taker's streak is one of the most stupid things the WWE could do, even if he was helping younger talent that would just destroy his legacy, imagine a sign with 19-1 which one is better that or this 20-0? his streak is his legacy, he doesnt get as many title shots as mcmahon's son in law gets, the least they could do is give him a wrestlemania undefeated streak..... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top