Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
iHav to Drive
Power Sports & Motorsports
Why do they make both hardtail and soft tail mountain bikes?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bikeworks" data-source="post: 1653667" data-attributes="member: 374991"><p>Not-so-long ago there was no such thing as suspension on a bike. Yes, there were springs but they could hardly be considered suspension.</p><p></p><p>Hardtails are lighter and allow more of the riders energy to be transferred to the ground. I would say that 99% of riders really don't need full suspension, but somehow they believe that it helps and that's cool if thats what you want.</p><p></p><p>Suspension is to keep the wheels on the ground for better handling and power transfer, not necessarily for comfort. </p><p></p><p>Think about it this way... a luxury car has very plush suspension to keep the occupants comfortable. They are also big and heavy and eat a lot of fuel. Jeeps are rough and tumble and tend to be harsh riding on the road. They have very stiff suspension but are at home playing in the dirt and they usually have pretty good fuel economy. Part of the reason for this disparity is because of the suspension.</p><p></p><p>Now, it also wasn't too long ago that I, a bike designer, was of the opinion that suspension was for people that lacked proper technique- we have suspension built into our bodies (elbows, knees, etc) and just have to learn to use it. I have since developed a keen sense of propriety and utility and have changed my opinion that suspension, especially a good fork, greatly enchances the riders abilities. Full suspension is good to, for those that need it and understand its application.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bikeworks, post: 1653667, member: 374991"] Not-so-long ago there was no such thing as suspension on a bike. Yes, there were springs but they could hardly be considered suspension. Hardtails are lighter and allow more of the riders energy to be transferred to the ground. I would say that 99% of riders really don't need full suspension, but somehow they believe that it helps and that's cool if thats what you want. Suspension is to keep the wheels on the ground for better handling and power transfer, not necessarily for comfort. Think about it this way... a luxury car has very plush suspension to keep the occupants comfortable. They are also big and heavy and eat a lot of fuel. Jeeps are rough and tumble and tend to be harsh riding on the road. They have very stiff suspension but are at home playing in the dirt and they usually have pretty good fuel economy. Part of the reason for this disparity is because of the suspension. Now, it also wasn't too long ago that I, a bike designer, was of the opinion that suspension was for people that lacked proper technique- we have suspension built into our bodies (elbows, knees, etc) and just have to learn to use it. I have since developed a keen sense of propriety and utility and have changed my opinion that suspension, especially a good fork, greatly enchances the riders abilities. Full suspension is good to, for those that need it and understand its application. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top