Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Mobile
Carriers
Rogers
Why do you think the White House is refusing to let social secretary Desiree...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Natalie" data-source="post: 2040368" data-attributes="member: 209057"><p>It is their privilege. White House has a Constitutional right to do it. It was not a subpoena, but an invitation. Salahis also have that right. They are not required to show up, just like they were not required to agree to be interviewed by the Secret Service. It was a huge mistake on their part that they did, because now they can be charged with a crime of lying to them. Even if it is a perceived lie. It carries a mandatory prison sentence.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Natalie, post: 2040368, member: 209057"] It is their privilege. White House has a Constitutional right to do it. It was not a subpoena, but an invitation. Salahis also have that right. They are not required to show up, just like they were not required to agree to be interviewed by the Secret Service. It was a huge mistake on their part that they did, because now they can be charged with a crime of lying to them. Even if it is a perceived lie. It carries a mandatory prison sentence. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top