Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
iHav to Drive
American Muscle
Why does revisionist history not credit Jefferson Davis with freeing the...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DrePhilofshtt1" data-source="post: 2503550" data-attributes="member: 806139"><p>...slaves as much as Lincoln? Prior to the civil war Lincoln made it known to Davis that he would "gladly" (Lincoln's words) allow slavery to continue in slave states to preserve the union.</p><p>Ft. Sumter needing supplies Lincoln wrote Davis putting the ball in his court asking to supply the fort peacefully or for Davis to choose war. Davis attacked Lincoln then later signed the emancipation proclamation to cause unrest in the south and help the war effort.</p><p>So in effect had Davis simply negotiated Lincoln would have turned a blind eye to slavery so by attacking Davis had as much to do with ending slavery as Lincoln.</p><p>I just found it interesting how things are taught rather than the facts examined where history is concerned.</p><p>This is gonna start some crap but hey i like starting crap.</p><p>Crazy murve ..how does citing fact reflect on my views i care less what color people are this is just how history actually went down.</p><p>Dr. you remind me of the guy with the cheese head hat outside the FOX studio he doesn't know anything about FOX but he knows they lie. He can't cite a single FACT to support his being there he just knows he's right ...somehow LOL</p><p>lois...All you need do is go research it. i think you will find my account all though summarized fairly accurate as to the progression of events.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DrePhilofshtt1, post: 2503550, member: 806139"] ...slaves as much as Lincoln? Prior to the civil war Lincoln made it known to Davis that he would "gladly" (Lincoln's words) allow slavery to continue in slave states to preserve the union. Ft. Sumter needing supplies Lincoln wrote Davis putting the ball in his court asking to supply the fort peacefully or for Davis to choose war. Davis attacked Lincoln then later signed the emancipation proclamation to cause unrest in the south and help the war effort. So in effect had Davis simply negotiated Lincoln would have turned a blind eye to slavery so by attacking Davis had as much to do with ending slavery as Lincoln. I just found it interesting how things are taught rather than the facts examined where history is concerned. This is gonna start some crap but hey i like starting crap. Crazy murve ..how does citing fact reflect on my views i care less what color people are this is just how history actually went down. Dr. you remind me of the guy with the cheese head hat outside the FOX studio he doesn't know anything about FOX but he knows they lie. He can't cite a single FACT to support his being there he just knows he's right ...somehow LOL lois...All you need do is go research it. i think you will find my account all though summarized fairly accurate as to the progression of events. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top