Jun 16, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Information & News
RSS News
Science News
Why Google Has Broken Its Promise To Never Be Evil
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Geek" data-source="post: 2576224" data-attributes="member: 246624"><p>This is about Google's policy of only allowing "real" names for participants on Google+. Before I go into why this is evil, I want to point out without providing any details that I've already spotted dozens of pseudonymous people on Google+ that Google+ authorities have missed. So, their policy, as implemented, is absurd to a level that should be embarrassing if the people who run Goolge+ have that emotion. I sense that they do, and I sense that they are in fact rather embarrassed. I'm confident that Google+ will change its policy shortly. In the meantime, this comentary is for people like <a href="http://www.dsr.kvl.dk/~benno/" target="_blank">Benno Hansen</a> who said "Activities that need anonymity will produce the demand for anonymous sites....With anonymity there is no accountability. People should grow up and treat each other properly, using their real names."</p><p></p><p> <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/08/why_google_has_broken_its_prom.php" target="_blank">Read the rest of this post...</a> | <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/08/why_google_has_broken_its_prom.php#commentsArea" target="_blank">Read the comments on this post...</a><img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GregLadensBlog/~4/iwaxfFgbtfI" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " data-size="" style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Geek, post: 2576224, member: 246624"] This is about Google's policy of only allowing "real" names for participants on Google+. Before I go into why this is evil, I want to point out without providing any details that I've already spotted dozens of pseudonymous people on Google+ that Google+ authorities have missed. So, their policy, as implemented, is absurd to a level that should be embarrassing if the people who run Goolge+ have that emotion. I sense that they do, and I sense that they are in fact rather embarrassed. I'm confident that Google+ will change its policy shortly. In the meantime, this comentary is for people like [URL="http://www.dsr.kvl.dk/~benno/"]Benno Hansen[/URL] who said "Activities that need anonymity will produce the demand for anonymous sites....With anonymity there is no accountability. People should grow up and treat each other properly, using their real names." [URL="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/08/why_google_has_broken_its_prom.php"]Read the rest of this post...[/URL] | [URL="http://scienceblogs.com/gregladen/2011/08/why_google_has_broken_its_prom.php#commentsArea"]Read the comments on this post...[/URL][IMG]http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/GregLadensBlog/~4/iwaxfFgbtfI[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top