Jul 7, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
iHav to Drive
Eastern Imports
Why is Toyota willing to settle the firey runaway Lexus crash by paying $10
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="michael" data-source="post: 2449515" data-attributes="member: 207008"><p>Realpolitik at work. 10 million is a small price to pay to get that off their shoes - it was a loser even if they prevailed. </p><p></p><p>It is certain the driver had his foot on the accelerator instead of the brake; it is impossible for a Lexus - or even a Veyron - to reach 120 mph as reported with the brakes on. The plaintiffs could have managed to slip enough people with no understanding of automotive technology onto the jury to blame the design or construction - we even have some of those fools active in this corner of Y!A - but that is neither here nor there in the end. Toyota understands the meaning of "Pyrrhic victory."</p><p></p><p>This is nothing new. In 1982 seven people died of cyanide poisoning after taking Tylenol. Johnson & Johnson was quite sure the poison was introduced after distribution but elected to recall all Tylenol everywhere at a cost that was never announced but probably totalled over 100 million dollars, in 1982 dollars. It was a wise decision - if they hadn't everybody would have remembered J&J for being unwilling to protect their customers... even though J&J was completely innocent. Toyota also was being smart, knowing the consuming public often is not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="michael, post: 2449515, member: 207008"] Realpolitik at work. 10 million is a small price to pay to get that off their shoes - it was a loser even if they prevailed. It is certain the driver had his foot on the accelerator instead of the brake; it is impossible for a Lexus - or even a Veyron - to reach 120 mph as reported with the brakes on. The plaintiffs could have managed to slip enough people with no understanding of automotive technology onto the jury to blame the design or construction - we even have some of those fools active in this corner of Y!A - but that is neither here nor there in the end. Toyota understands the meaning of "Pyrrhic victory." This is nothing new. In 1982 seven people died of cyanide poisoning after taking Tylenol. Johnson & Johnson was quite sure the poison was introduced after distribution but elected to recall all Tylenol everywhere at a cost that was never announced but probably totalled over 100 million dollars, in 1982 dollars. It was a wise decision - if they hadn't everybody would have remembered J&J for being unwilling to protect their customers... even though J&J was completely innocent. Toyota also was being smart, knowing the consuming public often is not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top