Jul 9, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Lifestyle
The Great Outdoors
why not send the boats back (part 2)?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="itsmethenerd1" data-source="post: 2443468" data-attributes="member: 837993"><p>I've already asked one question http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsrFAsDMxvImrNwPboFlIcvT5gt.;_ylv=3?qid=20101219153303AA6vI6s and thanks to everyone for their thoughtful answers. To summarise my thinking there: I'm in support of a large, increased quota of refugees, but refugees coming by boat is bad for everyone. There is something wrong when people need to get on a rickety boat to increase their chances of being accepted as a refugee.</p><p></p><p>But the answers I guess didn't directly answer my thinking. Bearing in mind that most boats of refugees come (to Australia) from Indonesia, and most of these refugees are not originally from Indonesia and not in danger of persecution in Indonesia, why would this not work:</p><p></p><p>* Fund a refugee processing centre in Indonesia. People can apply for asylum there without getting on a boat first.</p><p></p><p>* Reach an agreement with Indonesia that any boat of asylum seekers, if we could ascertain it came from Indonesia, would be sent back to Indonesia ("they came from there, they're going back"), even if the boat reached Australia. Change Australian law, if necessary, to allow this.</p><p></p><p>(Yes I know there would need to be exceptions for people who are being persecuted in Indonesia)</p><p></p><p>Again, I'm looking for legal / practical answers why this would not work, not political debate.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="itsmethenerd1, post: 2443468, member: 837993"] I've already asked one question http://au.answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsrFAsDMxvImrNwPboFlIcvT5gt.;_ylv=3?qid=20101219153303AA6vI6s and thanks to everyone for their thoughtful answers. To summarise my thinking there: I'm in support of a large, increased quota of refugees, but refugees coming by boat is bad for everyone. There is something wrong when people need to get on a rickety boat to increase their chances of being accepted as a refugee. But the answers I guess didn't directly answer my thinking. Bearing in mind that most boats of refugees come (to Australia) from Indonesia, and most of these refugees are not originally from Indonesia and not in danger of persecution in Indonesia, why would this not work: * Fund a refugee processing centre in Indonesia. People can apply for asylum there without getting on a boat first. * Reach an agreement with Indonesia that any boat of asylum seekers, if we could ascertain it came from Indonesia, would be sent back to Indonesia ("they came from there, they're going back"), even if the boat reached Australia. Change Australian law, if necessary, to allow this. (Yes I know there would need to be exceptions for people who are being persecuted in Indonesia) Again, I'm looking for legal / practical answers why this would not work, not political debate. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top