Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussions
Health
Working out in sets vs "to exhaustion"?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="john" data-source="post: 2749766" data-attributes="member: 5463"><p>So it seems to be a very complex subject, and I mean very complex. At least, that's what it seems like in what I've read. It seems like certain numbers of repetitions in a set over some amount of sets vs a different number and different amount of sets, will have different effects on the muscles.</p><p></p><p>Like APPARENTLY, and I don't really know from experience, but one type of workout might result in leaner, more compact muscle, but another will result in bulking up, or so I've heard. </p><p></p><p>So knowing that, what effects would continuous reps until exhaustion have?</p><p></p><p>Also, I'll use pushups as an easy example. Continuously, I can can do about 25 at my current weight, with the fatigue only hitting me about 18-20 through, then it gets really tough. However in sets, this fatigue seems to hit faster. I can do the same amount of pushups, but the end result is that my muscles don't kill me. It also seems like doing them in sets is increasing my strength faster then when doing them continuously. </p><p></p><p>What is the science behind this? Why would one style keep you compact, one make you bulky? Also, it seems diet is quite important as well, which to be honest, seems a lot simpler than all this other technical stuff. Can any experienced weightlifters, or just very fit people who workout often answer these questions? Thanks a lot!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="john, post: 2749766, member: 5463"] So it seems to be a very complex subject, and I mean very complex. At least, that's what it seems like in what I've read. It seems like certain numbers of repetitions in a set over some amount of sets vs a different number and different amount of sets, will have different effects on the muscles. Like APPARENTLY, and I don't really know from experience, but one type of workout might result in leaner, more compact muscle, but another will result in bulking up, or so I've heard. So knowing that, what effects would continuous reps until exhaustion have? Also, I'll use pushups as an easy example. Continuously, I can can do about 25 at my current weight, with the fatigue only hitting me about 18-20 through, then it gets really tough. However in sets, this fatigue seems to hit faster. I can do the same amount of pushups, but the end result is that my muscles don't kill me. It also seems like doing them in sets is increasing my strength faster then when doing them continuously. What is the science behind this? Why would one style keep you compact, one make you bulky? Also, it seems diet is quite important as well, which to be honest, seems a lot simpler than all this other technical stuff. Can any experienced weightlifters, or just very fit people who workout often answer these questions? Thanks a lot! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top