Would republicans have been happier to see Chrysler fail rather that see us get

GOZ2FAST

New member
If a car company makes crappy cars that cost more to produce than they can sell them for, they should bankrupt so a better company can take their place...GOVERNMENT SHOULD KEEP THEIR STUPID PAWS OFF PRIVATE COMPANIES.
 

sparky

Member
If we hold another cash for clunkers party at cost to taxpayers $10 billion, perhaps Chrysler will pay back $5 billion more.

Good business model.
 

TicToceeee

New member
I don't care because the only good car they ever made was.

http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs15/f/2007/012/9/2/ACdesign_1970_Dodge_Challenger_by_AC_design.jpg
 

JohnHinkle

New member
As much as I'd like to see US companies succeed, sometimes you have to sit back and watch as bad management and bad choices run there course. (aka file for bankruptcy and work it out).

Wouldn't it have been better to have put that 7.6 billion toward paying the debt?

Just askin?
 

entropy

New member
Chrysler did fail. they declared bankruptcy, and that allowed them to restructure their debts and obligations, which they needed. The loans before that just delayed the inevitable by a few months.
 

WhiskeyWhiskey

New member
1.The premise that the Obama administration had "loaned" the money is false.
2.That the TARP money used was allowed to be used in that fashion, it was not.
3.The Obama administration bought stock.
4. The purchase of stock allows the government at enact laws that would put up barriers to competition to look out for its interest in the companies. Talk about anti-trust issues.


You and I are in the same competing businesses. I have the government writing laws or building situations to put you out of business.I have a unlimited line of credit, incentive program to have customers buy are protected, unfair access to government contracts and the full weight of the government to pass any law to protect its interest in my company.
 
Top