Jul 3, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Zimmerman Martin Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Meow2The3rd" data-source="post: 3278413" data-attributes="member: 158559"><p>As far as I know shooting someone in the back isn't legal. Perhaps if someone is in your home you could claim you thought something was going on that you actually knew wasn't, but that's another issue. The woman being convicted for firing a warning shot? That's it? There's no other motive or anything to that case? Were they perhaps wondering if her warning shot could have hit someone else? Seems like a pretty stupid case to convict someone so quickly.. </p><p></p><p>The problem is in a stand your ground state, the law needs to be laid out flat, here is what you can do, here is what you can not.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Meow2The3rd, post: 3278413, member: 158559"] As far as I know shooting someone in the back isn't legal. Perhaps if someone is in your home you could claim you thought something was going on that you actually knew wasn't, but that's another issue. The woman being convicted for firing a warning shot? That's it? There's no other motive or anything to that case? Were they perhaps wondering if her warning shot could have hit someone else? Seems like a pretty stupid case to convict someone so quickly.. The problem is in a stand your ground state, the law needs to be laid out flat, here is what you can do, here is what you can not. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top