Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Stephbrooke" data-source="post: 3278456" data-attributes="member: 163728">I may have it wrong, but that entire post appears to be in defense of zimmerman.He may not have been breaking the law when he stalked a stranger (carrying a deadly weapon)He may of not even have been breaking the law when he pulled out that deadly weapon and shot dead the person he decided to stalk. (When he started to lose the fight)But the whole responsibility for the entire situation, rests squarely on the shoulders of zimmerman when he decided (of his own accord) to peruse and escalate the situation, resulting in a young persons death.From begining to end, it was zimmerman who stalked martin (not the other way around) and it was zimmerman who carried out the persuit, knowing full well he had a deadly weapon carried about his person, he could not doubt that he would &#039;win&#039; whatever the situation (unless martin had a gun too, which he didnt)Its indefensable that Zimmerman persued a complete stranger, (after being told not to by the police) followed a stranger, and then shooting them dead.That was not self defence, it was stalking, and then murder. Pretty simple, disregarding anything you might have to say about martin and his &#039;youthfull antics&#039;.He did not deserve to be stalked, and then shot, simply because zimmerman thought he was up to &#039;no good&#039;.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Stephbrooke, post: 3278456, member: 163728"] I may have it wrong, but that entire post appears to be in defense of zimmerman. He may not have been breaking the law when he stalked a stranger (carrying a deadly weapon) He may of not even have been breaking the law when he pulled out that deadly weapon and shot dead the person he decided to stalk. (When he started to lose the fight) But the whole responsibility for the entire situation, rests squarely on the shoulders of zimmerman when he decided (of his own accord) to peruse and escalate the situation, resulting in a young persons death. From begining to end, it was zimmerman who stalked martin (not the other way around) and it was zimmerman who carried out the persuit, knowing full well he had a deadly weapon carried about his person, he could not doubt that he would 'win' whatever the situation (unless martin had a gun too, which he didnt) Its indefensable that Zimmerman persued a complete stranger, (after being told not to by the police) followed a stranger, and then shooting them dead. That was not self defence, it was stalking, and then murder. Pretty simple, disregarding anything you might have to say about martin and his 'youthfull antics'. He did not deserve to be stalked, and then shot, simply because zimmerman thought he was up to 'no good'. [/QUOTE]

Name

Verification

Loading…