Jul 4, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
OffTopic Community
Offtopic Forum
Zimmerman Martin Case
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tubby" data-source="post: 3278689" data-attributes="member: 102360"><p>Agreed</p><p></p><p></p><p>While NOT on the job, let's remember</p><p></p><p></p><p>You're suggesting that an off-duty neighborhood watcher follows who he considers a suspect for something, and forgets he's carrying a gun?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Not if he hadn't followed Martin</p><p></p><p></p><p>Why would we suspect that M had a gun "where he was from"?</p><p></p><p></p><p>Truth is they made a decision based on the information they had. Which, to me, sees miles short of the information they needed.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tubby, post: 3278689, member: 102360"] Agreed While NOT on the job, let's remember You're suggesting that an off-duty neighborhood watcher follows who he considers a suspect for something, and forgets he's carrying a gun? Not if he hadn't followed Martin Why would we suspect that M had a gun "where he was from"? Truth is they made a decision based on the information they had. Which, to me, sees miles short of the information they needed. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top