doctrine

Henry Waxman seems to think so: http://spectator.org/archives/2009/02/16/in-all-fairness -snip Waxman is also interested, say sources, in looking at how the Internet is being used for content and free speech purposes. "It's all about diversity in media," says a House Energy staffer, familiar...

I hope all of them diligently continue the fight daily.... Too bad your liberal talk radio shows could not keep as huge of a listening population and went under due to their ignorance. We will keep up the fight til the end...

When they realize that the rationale for the doctrine in terms of public airwaves is the same for the web, you might get more support against it.

The doctrine's requirement for so-called "balance may include religion." If an opposing view must be found for every matter of controversy, Christian broadcasters could find themselves in the unenviable and untenable position of seeking out other religious viewpoints – Islamic, Hindu, Buddhist...

No, it is not fair at all and is unconstitutional.

The following are quotes from fundamentalists' answers: *Hatred*: "Catholicism = faith + works = no salvation and eternal torment in hell" *Conspiracy*: "Catholicism is not Christian. Here's why" *Lies*: "DOCTRINE MATTERS. And catholics never talk doctrine. They just call names."...

being found in Scripture,? don't they sound a lot like the Pharisees when they attacked Jesus for not adhering to Scripture according to their take on it? Did the Old Testament say to love your enemies and to do good to them or did it say an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth? Pasture...