Say a murder was committed leaving no fingerprints, DNA, murder weapon, or material evidence of any kind, but witnesses were present that could identify the murderer in detail and pick him out of a line up.
How many witnesses based upon subjective personal accounts would it take for you to convict him?
2? 10? 100? 500?
Would you let him just walk away no matter how many people saw the crime?
How many witnesses based upon subjective personal accounts would it take for you to convict him?
2? 10? 100? 500?
Would you let him just walk away no matter how many people saw the crime?