against our judeo-christian values? In Exodus, one the Israelites/sons of Israel escape, they start passing legislation. Included is the regulation/legitimatizing of slavery. Adding a racial tone, it seems as though Hebrew slaves are to be treated better than some freaking foreign slave. It seems as though Exodus doesn't decry the Israelites being slaves, but that their slave masters weren't Israelites.
@4HIM-CHRISTIANS
"You do realize that the books from Exodus to Esther are the history of the nation of Israel and not laws for us today?"
Are you admitting that God was OK with slavery during that time?
@ Ami
The halacha's retroactive explanation is BS. The word slave (eved/avadim) was used both for what the israelites were in Egypt and what was later legitimatized.
@ Greg
As usual, when a verse is called into question, the apologists will point to other sources that conflict with it. They think this solves the dilemma, but it merely proves that all these scripts were written by multiple human entities. The laws passed in exodus after escaping egypt use the word "eved" (slave) which is the same word used to describe what the israelites were in Egypt. Not. Indentured. Servitude. But. Rather. Slaves.
@4HIM-CHRISTIANS
"You do realize that the books from Exodus to Esther are the history of the nation of Israel and not laws for us today?"
Are you admitting that God was OK with slavery during that time?
@ Ami
The halacha's retroactive explanation is BS. The word slave (eved/avadim) was used both for what the israelites were in Egypt and what was later legitimatized.
@ Greg
As usual, when a verse is called into question, the apologists will point to other sources that conflict with it. They think this solves the dilemma, but it merely proves that all these scripts were written by multiple human entities. The laws passed in exodus after escaping egypt use the word "eved" (slave) which is the same word used to describe what the israelites were in Egypt. Not. Indentured. Servitude. But. Rather. Slaves.