Bob Woodward Says Donald Rumsfeld is "Ducking and Weaving and Dodging...

BigGameHunter

New member
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
...Responsibility”? Bob Woodward, the longtime chronicler of Washington’s inner workings, has a scathing assessment of Donald Rumsfeld’s new memoir, writing Tuesday morning that by “ducking and weaving and dodging responsibility” in the book, the former defense secretary has exemplified “much of what is worst in Washington.”

Woodward closely covered the George W. Bush administration and, in particular, focused on the run-up to — and conduct of — the Iraq war in his reporting for four books and The Washington Post. Rumsfeld has gotten it all wrong, Woodward wrote in a fiery item published on Foreign Policy’s website.

In his memoir released last month, “Known and Unknown,” and in promotional interviews for the book, Rumsfeld has repeatedly offered a full-throated defense of his role at the Pentagon from early 2001 through his resignation in 2006. Rumsfeld has denied making any major mistakes in Iraq and instead has blamed then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, then-Secretary of State Colin Powell and even President Bush for any mishandling.

“Rumsfeld’s memoir is one big clean-up job, a brazen effort to shift blame to others — including President Bush — distort history, ignore the record or simply avoid discussing matters that cannot be airbrushed away,” Woodward wrote. “It is a travesty, and I think the rewrite job won’t wash.”

Woodward cites his own reporting as evidence that Rumsfeld’s accounts of the Bush era are wrong. In January 2002, Rumsfeld conceded to Woodward and Post reporter Dan Balz that he had suggested going after not just Osama bin Laden but also Saddam Hussein on Sept. 12, 2001.

And Rumsfeld’s camp hit back late Tuesday afternoon, characterizing Woodward as an author who practices “access journalism,” Rumsfeld chief of staff Keith Urbahn said in a statement.

While a young reporter for The Washington Post in 1972, Woodward was teamed up with Carl Bernstein; the two did much of the original news reporting on the Watergate scandal. These scandals led to numerous government investigations and the eventual resignation of President Richard Nixon.

Gene Roberts, the former executive editor of The Philadelphia Inquirer and former managing editor of The New York Times, has called the work of Woodward and Bernstein "maybe the single greatest reporting effort of all time."

What Are Your Thoughts About This????

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0311/50427.html

Add Stars!!!!
 
Woodward hits the nail on the head. Rumsfeld said he only made one mistake. I doubt that he actually did more than one thing right. Bush waited too long to fire him.
 
And bears sh!t in the woods. Thank you for stating the obvious after everyone else already has, Woodward?
 
Rumsfeld hasn't been relevant for years
Woodward hasn't been relevant in decades

perhaps you'd like to join us in the 21st century
 
Bob Woodward is a typical biased activist journalist, a captain in the socialist over throw of America.

Bob Woodward is the type of biased liberal journalist whose life's work centered around exposing Nixon for abuses of power and crime. However, when the Clintons slithered into the WH, the crimes, abuses of power and corruption were far worse and on a much larger scale than Nixon, SO what was Bob Woodward doing while the Clintons were selling pardons to criminals for millions of dollars, widespread intimidation of witnesses, more crimes than I can list on this response, Bob Woodward had no issue with the Clinton's crimes, cover-ups, scandals, abuses of power, intimidation of witnesses!

Woodward is a tool of socialism, screw that clown, don't waste a second listening to his slander.
 
Woodward is using his own biased reporting as proof that Rumsfeld is "ducking and dodging"! Sort of reaching isn't it?
The only mistake the Bush administration made was believing the Democrats would place the welfare of the Country ahead of party politics.
 
I remember hearing Rumsfeld talking about this idea that later turned into the title of his book, and noticing one glaring logical omission.

He said that in Iraq, there were "known knowns", or things we knew with certainty; there were "known unknowns", or things we were aware that we didn't know; and there were "unknown unknowns" or things that we didn't know we didn't know.

He glaringly left out the category of "unknown knowns", or the things we thought we knew, but which were in fact completely false.


He also blew my mind when he stated that we knew exactly where Saddamn's prohibited WMD were....."In the area around Baghdad and Tikrit, and somewhat to the East, North, South, and West of there".

No, he never made any mistakes...
 
Of course he's right. Rumsfeld is a pathological liar and a war criminal.
 
Back
Top