...won't create more jobs to push agenda? Do you think OBAMA & PELOSI specifically chose not to deliver stimulus immediately to the parts of the economy most likely to pay more revenue to government in future years after the economy grows back.
Generally most Presidents choose to cut tax rates during a recession because it definitively delivers stimulus dollars to the economy that is proportional to the most likely growth of revenue(i.e. whomever pays tax revenues to the government today is most likely to pay more revenue in the future).
Obama instead followed Pelosi's leadership and chose to follow Jimmy Carter's failed stimulus plan which historically will not increase employment.
Do you believe that OBAMA & PELOSI may have chosen this jobless path on purpose in order to help generate support for a more radical entitlement-based reform of healthcare?
Generally most Presidents choose to cut tax rates during a recession because it definitively delivers stimulus dollars to the economy that is proportional to the most likely growth of revenue(i.e. whomever pays tax revenues to the government today is most likely to pay more revenue in the future).
Obama instead followed Pelosi's leadership and chose to follow Jimmy Carter's failed stimulus plan which historically will not increase employment.
Do you believe that OBAMA & PELOSI may have chosen this jobless path on purpose in order to help generate support for a more radical entitlement-based reform of healthcare?