Does the outline of the introduction to my irrefutable proof of the

Cosmic

Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2008
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Points
6
existence of God give you the thirst? for more and are you ready for more? What is your opinion? What are your concerns?

1.0 Introduction:
This proof only confirms the existence of God, the Creator of our universe and all life within it. It does not and it cannot trace the origin of God because that would require us to know God's realm. The proof utilizes the relationships between space, time, matter, energy, and the "unseen" dimensions. The relationships of life and most importantly mind are the keystone that makes this proof irrefutable.

2.0 Dedication:
This proof is dedicated to those who have known in their hearts that God exists. Now you can rest easily. Your unrelenting belief has given me the dogged determination to solve this age-old question once and for all.

. . . and more.

Addendum:

A1.0: Philosophical Questions Answered by this Proof:

A1.1: What is the definition of a creator?
A1.2: How was our universe created?
A1.3 Is God actively involved with with our universe (interacting) or does our universe "run" on its own? and is every event predestined? (relates to mankind's Quantum Mechanical Theory and its limitations).

. . . and more questions and answers.
 
Erm... I don't see a proof here. I would, at this point, think it's going to the kind of 'proof' that sidesteps the question, and offers nothing.
 
No, it's just as much bollocks as any argument based solely on logic that is supposed to establish an existence claim.
 
Sounds like it's going to be a long-winded version of begging the question with some pseudo-scientific "quantum" mysticism.
 
This is just a restatement of the " the universe is logical so there must be a god argument" dressed up to look pseudo-scientific. The difficult question of how did god come into being is simply dismissed as unknowable using a nonsensical statement designed to sound intelligent.
 
Back
Top