during the time of christ there were many well known historians going

D

Derek

Member
Joined
May 13, 2008
Messages
426
Reaction score
0
Points
16
around and none of them mentioned christ?
Google,go to the library search for the truth,Blind faith! come-on dont let me shake your foundations praise the lord! CHECK THIS SITE OUT http://www.vexen.co.uk/religion/christianity_nojesus.html
also there are some books just google your noodle
 
It seems you haqve never4 heard of Josephus the well-known Jewish historian as well as some Roman ones who did make record of Christ
 
No historical records? :mad:Some of the non-Biblical sources for the historicity of Jesus Christ include Roman historian, Cornelious Tacitus ; Jewish historian, Flavius Josephus ; Roman historian, Suetonius ; governor of Bithynia, Plinius Secundus ; and the jurist/theologian, Tertullian.
 
Name them . . .

Who are all your "well-known" historians ?

There was none better known than Flavius Josephus
and He most certainly acknowledged Jesus Christ.

You're fighting a lost cause.

There are references to Jesus by several other
historians.Tacitus, who was praetor under
Domitian in A.D. 88, only 58 yrs after Jesus
was crucified, refers to Christ (annal XV:44)

Pliny the Younger, who was tribune in Syria
about the same time also refers to Jesus.

There are also references in Lucian, who lived
about the middle of the second century. He
states explicitly the fact of Christ having been
crucified.

Suetonius and Eusebius also refer to Christ.

Besides this evidence, the persecution of the
Christians, under Nero, which is recorded by all
historians. Nero died in A.D. 68, only 38 yrs
after the Jesus was crucified.
 
Back
Top