HOW CAN U BELEVE N GOD ITS SO STUPID LOL?

Z

ZachJuni

New member
Joined
Jul 11, 2011
Messages
0
Reaction score
0
Points
0
it just dosnt make sense. Becuase we have evolution that means we dont have god, and were is this guy anyhow lol, i see my milkman, but i cant find this jesus feloow haha. common christians, u need to look at the facts and not be ignerant. Join the winning team. any book that old cant be real. go TEAM DARWIN!
Dont appreciate this hate, havent hurd one good arguement yet
 
The rain falls on the good and the wicked. And retarded lives in both theist and atheist camps. Christians are not all inbred knuckle dragging mouth breathers and all atheists are not intellectual paragons.
 
Peace

Evolution have been refuted thousand times..

NATURAL SELECTION

The concept of natural selection was the basis of Darwinism. This assertion is stressed even in the title of the book in which Darwin proposed his theory: The Origin of Species, by means of Natural Selection…

Natural selection is based on the assumption that in nature there is a constant struggle for survival. It favors organisms with traits that best enable them to cope with pressures exerted by the environment. At the end of this struggle, the strongest ones, the ones most suited to natural conditions, survive. For example, in a herd of deer under threat from predators, those individuals that can run fastest will naturally survive. As a consequence, the herd of deer will eventually consist of only fast-running individuals.

However, no matter how long this process goes on, it will not transform those deer into another species. The weak deer are eliminated, the strong survive, but, since no alteration in their genetic data takes place, no transformation of a species occurs. Despite the continuous processes of selection, deer continue to exist as deer.

The deer example is true for all species. In any population, natural selection only eliminates those weak, or unsuited individuals who are unable to adapt to the natural conditions in their habitat. It does not produce new species, new genetic information, or new organs. That is, it cannot cause anything to evolve. Darwin, too, accepted this fact, stating that "Natural selection can do nothing until favourable individual differences or variations occur."7 That is why neo-Darwinism had to add the mutation mechanism as a factor altering genetic information to the concept of natural selection.

We will deal with mutations next. But before proceeding, we need to further examine the concept of natural selection in order to see the contradictions inherent in it.

A STRUGGLE FOR SURVIVAL?


Darwin had been influenced by Thomas Malthus when he developed his thesis of the struggle for life. But observations and experiments proved Malthus wrong.
The essential assumption of the theory of natural selection holds that there is a fierce struggle for survival in nature, and every living thing cares only for itself. At the time Darwin proposed this theory, the ideas of Thomas Malthus, the British classical economist, were an important influence on him. Malthus maintained that human beings were inevitably in a constant struggle for survival, basing his views on the fact that population, and hence the need for food resources, increases geometrically, while food resources themselves increase only arithmetically. The result is that population size is inevitably checked by factors in the environment, such as hunger and disease. Darwin adapted Malthus's vision of a fierce struggle for survival among human beings to nature at large, and claimed that "natural selection" is a consequence of this struggle.

Further research, however, revealed that there was no struggle for life in nature as Darwin had postulated. As a result of extensive research into animal groups in the 1960s and 1970s, V. C. Wynne-Edwards, a British zoologist, concluded that living things balance their population in an interesting way, which prevents competition for food. Animal groups were simply managing their population on the basis of their food resources. Population was regulated not by elimination of the weak through factors like epidemics or starvation, but by instinctive control mechanisms. In other words, animals controlled their numbers not by fierce competition, as Darwin suggested, but by limiting reproduction.8

Even plants exhibited examples of population control, which invalidated Darwin's suggestion of selection by means of competition. The botanist A. D. Bradshaw's observations indicated that during reproduction, plants behaved according to the "density" of the planting, and limited their reproduction if the area was highly populated with plants.9 On the other hand, examples of sacrifice observed in animals such as ants and bees display a model completely opposed to the Darwinist struggle for survival.

In recent years, research has revealed findings regarding self-sacrifice even in bacteria. These living things without brains or nervous systems, totally devoid of any capacity for thought, kill themselves to save other bacteria when they are invaded by viruses.10

These examples surely invalidate the basic assumption of natural selection-the absolute struggle for survival. It is true that there is competition in nature; however, there are clear models of self-sacrifice and solidarity, as well.
 
If in the "End" God is seen to be real then all of us will look at you and LOL ...Ha Ha Ha
 
and what point you like to make!!

The scientific problem with human evolution is that it is built upon the weak science of paleoanthropology. Even one of the most orthodox evolutionist evangelists Richard Leakey admitted, ". . . I often felt that paleoanthropology was more of an art than a science. -> Christian

J
 
Are you a Christian pretending to be an Atheist or just a really fucking retarded atheist?
 
as an agnostic, I too believe in evolution. But we should not be bashing the beliefs of other's without cause.
 
You have to define God to be able to believe in it, or not believe in it.

Now, if God is everything, do you believe in it or not?

If God is a man in the sky who plays scrabble all day long, do you believe it or not?

If God is like the matrix, do you believe it, or not?

If God is what the bible says, do you believe it or not?

God can be whatever you want, so not believing in God is quite stupid too, because chances are someone's view of God is going to be quite accurate, whereas another person's will be like a smoked up dream!!!
 
Back
Top