If canon was closed after Christ, and Paul was after Christ, does it...

W

Wispy

New member
Joined
Mar 23, 2009
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Points
1
...follow that none of his letters are canon? Why the exception? If Paul could(and did) add to the Bible, why not modern additions to the Scriptures?
Soo the canon was closed by committee decision and all those Christians who glibly say canon closed with Christ are full of beans?
@ Desiree ah c'mon why should I play fair when you don't?
 
Who said Canon is closed after christ?
And oh, Paul is already known as liar to historians.
 
first of all canon was not closed after christ. in the christian world. the hebrews committed a great sin when they canonized the old testament and christians commit a great sin by declaring the bible to be the only truth.

while Paulian epistles are canonized they are NOT the ultimate truth. neither is the bible the ultimate truth
the ultimate truth is true conversion and faith in righteousness.

some of the paulian epistles are actually contradictory to the words of jesus. so we know that the constantine did not formulate a final gospel in written word.

again paul did not add to the bible. the jews first deleted from the prophets and the Nicean council formulated the bible NOT Paul or the jews. what is left is the apocrapha and the writings of prophets that men have never known. NO man can live according to the written word and expect to LIVE in Glory there must be a always be a prophet and cintinuing revelation.
 
That's as silly as saying "Because the letter "B" comes after the letter "A" in the alphabet, then the letter "C" is not part of the alphabet! (TRY, please, oh PLEASE, try to think and use a little rational intelligence rather than just spuing nonsense!)
 
The first time the Christian canon was closed was in 140 AD, well after Paul. The New Testament as we have it today was closed in 393 AD.
 
You need to tell people that you're a Mormon and by asking this question, it's a weasel's way of arguing for Mormonism.
 
Back
Top