If Jesus Christ did not ordain any women, is it not pride for women to

I think you are quite correct,it can only be pride connected to some level of feminism for God does not call women to the priestly class not in the old or the new testament.
 
Jesus probably didn't eat pasta, does that mean Christians shouldn't eat pasta too? Just because Jesus apparently didn't do something, doesn't mean all his followers should follow suit.
 
How can anyone ordain themselves? Ok here's the satan inspiring women to preach himself, question again. Even satan is not that stupid.
 
As an atheist perhaps I can look upon your mythology with a little less bias. Your council of Nicea created the bible as you know it today back in the third century or so. Excluded from that bible were things like the Gospel of Thecla--a female evangalist and companion of Paul. This gospel details the life of a female evangalist and was excluded from the bible not on the fact that it was somehow forged or faked--but it clearly did not fit in with the paternalistic views of the era. A political decision about what makes the bible in other words. So for paternalistic people I guess your point is taken--for rational people who understand the politics of religon--you are dead wrong.
 
Ever since the fall of men women have had a greater tendency to continue following in the paths of pride, arrogance and idolatry. This is why the bible counsels on them submitting to their husbands and not being suitable for the priesthood which is different than preaching the gospel as any other member of the church.
 
Back
Top