nextkobe1986
New member
- Jul 9, 2010
- 2
- 0
- 1
Is everybody in agreement with the "new trend" of the NBA...Gang the best players
on 1 team? I mean the "big 3" in boston is different. 1.they didn't have a summit and meet with each other and said hey, let's get together to win. The team put that together. 2.They are not in their primes. They were on their last hopes to win a championship, after they did the best, "the hard AND right way" by sticking with their teams. I mean lebron and bosh...and build around them....ok. Wade and bosh..and build around them..ok. It was Shaq and Kobe, then you had your pieces in fisher, rick fox, robert horry...Last year, you had your clear star in Kobe, and a Pau gasol, then you had your pieces, Artest for defense, odom from the bench,etc. Not 3 POWERHOUSES. I mean wade and lebron are the #2 and 3 best in the league and bosh is in the top 5 at least in PF.
So my question is, do you think ganging all of the best on 1 team good for the NBA? Like wade, bosh, and lebron in miami, carmello, kobe, and kevin durant in LA, amare, dirk, and chris paul in NY, then you have like 5 or 6 great teams and 25 sucky teams. I mean that's not good.
I mean i thought it would better to play AGAINST the BEST and to BEAT the best, not play WITH the best as your only way of winning. This is the exact reason i don't like lebron. He is and will always be more hype than truth. I NEVER WANNA HEAR HE IS BETTER THAN KOBE OR MJ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Neither of them would EVER do this!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yes, lebron is GREAT and maybe is the best athlete of all time, but he is not the best!
on 1 team? I mean the "big 3" in boston is different. 1.they didn't have a summit and meet with each other and said hey, let's get together to win. The team put that together. 2.They are not in their primes. They were on their last hopes to win a championship, after they did the best, "the hard AND right way" by sticking with their teams. I mean lebron and bosh...and build around them....ok. Wade and bosh..and build around them..ok. It was Shaq and Kobe, then you had your pieces in fisher, rick fox, robert horry...Last year, you had your clear star in Kobe, and a Pau gasol, then you had your pieces, Artest for defense, odom from the bench,etc. Not 3 POWERHOUSES. I mean wade and lebron are the #2 and 3 best in the league and bosh is in the top 5 at least in PF.
So my question is, do you think ganging all of the best on 1 team good for the NBA? Like wade, bosh, and lebron in miami, carmello, kobe, and kevin durant in LA, amare, dirk, and chris paul in NY, then you have like 5 or 6 great teams and 25 sucky teams. I mean that's not good.
I mean i thought it would better to play AGAINST the BEST and to BEAT the best, not play WITH the best as your only way of winning. This is the exact reason i don't like lebron. He is and will always be more hype than truth. I NEVER WANNA HEAR HE IS BETTER THAN KOBE OR MJ!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Neither of them would EVER do this!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Yes, lebron is GREAT and maybe is the best athlete of all time, but he is not the best!