Heath Ledger is the Australian-born actor who played the part of "The Joker" in the latest Batman 2008 movie installment, "The Dark Knight". He died in a "toxic combination of prescription drugs" (source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heath_Ledger) last January 2008, so there was significant talk about him at last year's Academy Awards in February 2008 although "The Dark Knight" was not brought up yet for award nominations.
Last night was the 2009 Academy Awards and Heath Ledger was honored when he won for Best Supporting Male Actor. There was also a special presentation on stage with his family and others saying eulogistic words for him, similar to some of what we heard at the 2008 Academy Awards when they took time out to say words of sorrow for Keith Ledger.
And then, there was all the hype the past few weeks leading up to this year's Academy Awards and virtually across the board, all the Hollywood pundits and reporters were saying Heath Ledger was a shoe-in for the Best Supporting Actor award. "Heath Ledger! Heath Ledger! Heath Ledger!"...was all that seemed to be coming from the TV the last several days whenever the news channels turned attention to the Academy Awards.
Now I am always one to show respect when someone has done a good job, and particularly when someone of merit has passed away. But I do note that other memorable actors and actresses have died in the world yet I cannot recall when there was more fuss made about an actor passing (save that of Ronald Reagan) than there was with Heath Ledger.
Why? Was he "the GREATEST actor of all time?"
[Actually, I like Jack Nicholson's portrayal of The Joker better than Heath Ledger's...and Heath also played Ennis Del Mar in "Brokeback Mountain" which I didn't care for as a Western.]
My theory is that some people are drama junkies and getting behind a worthwhile cause -- be it to raise money for AIDS or to eulogize a fallen co-worker -- can sometimes motivate sympathetic hearts to an extreme. Hollywood is a cut-throat place where some would sell their own mother for a nickle if it got them some significant screen time, but they are also notorious as bleeding-heart liberals. So when there is a cause to show sympathy for something, they can go ALL OUT! (maybe to purge their own partying, guilt-ridden and tortured souls...smiles!)
Is it just my perception that the passing of Heath Ledger has been hyped to such an extreme that it may put other worthwhile actors' and actresses' passing to the pale?
No disrespect to the Ledger family intended. I'm just wondering if Hollywood is a little out-of-balance here with what the rest of the viewing public is shown and perceives. Was Ledger truly the GREATEST actor of all time? And if so, did I miss something?
Last night was the 2009 Academy Awards and Heath Ledger was honored when he won for Best Supporting Male Actor. There was also a special presentation on stage with his family and others saying eulogistic words for him, similar to some of what we heard at the 2008 Academy Awards when they took time out to say words of sorrow for Keith Ledger.
And then, there was all the hype the past few weeks leading up to this year's Academy Awards and virtually across the board, all the Hollywood pundits and reporters were saying Heath Ledger was a shoe-in for the Best Supporting Actor award. "Heath Ledger! Heath Ledger! Heath Ledger!"...was all that seemed to be coming from the TV the last several days whenever the news channels turned attention to the Academy Awards.
Now I am always one to show respect when someone has done a good job, and particularly when someone of merit has passed away. But I do note that other memorable actors and actresses have died in the world yet I cannot recall when there was more fuss made about an actor passing (save that of Ronald Reagan) than there was with Heath Ledger.
Why? Was he "the GREATEST actor of all time?"
[Actually, I like Jack Nicholson's portrayal of The Joker better than Heath Ledger's...and Heath also played Ennis Del Mar in "Brokeback Mountain" which I didn't care for as a Western.]
My theory is that some people are drama junkies and getting behind a worthwhile cause -- be it to raise money for AIDS or to eulogize a fallen co-worker -- can sometimes motivate sympathetic hearts to an extreme. Hollywood is a cut-throat place where some would sell their own mother for a nickle if it got them some significant screen time, but they are also notorious as bleeding-heart liberals. So when there is a cause to show sympathy for something, they can go ALL OUT! (maybe to purge their own partying, guilt-ridden and tortured souls...smiles!)
Is it just my perception that the passing of Heath Ledger has been hyped to such an extreme that it may put other worthwhile actors' and actresses' passing to the pale?
No disrespect to the Ledger family intended. I'm just wondering if Hollywood is a little out-of-balance here with what the rest of the viewing public is shown and perceives. Was Ledger truly the GREATEST actor of all time? And if so, did I miss something?