Jun 15, 2025
Оfftopic Community
Оfftopic Community
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
Featured content
New posts
New media
New media comments
New resources
New profile posts
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Resources
Latest reviews
Search resources
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Forums
Discussions
Religion
Is the reason for the similarities between Judaic and all other traditions that
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gnosisquest" data-source="post: 2733060" data-attributes="member: 697675"><p>Judaism had none? About 200 BCE (BC) Berossus wrote "Babylonica", Manetho wrote the Egyptian history and the Israelis supposedly translated their traditions into Greek.</p><p></p><p>How do you feel about the people now that argue that this was done so these people could practice old customs and since the Jews had no history of their own the borrowed and transposed histories from Greeks, Egyptians, Babylonians, Hittites and others to be validated among the Greek Rulers?</p><p>No, the history of the Jews is very scant, some aspects ore interwoven with other people's histories.</p><p>Genesis is Babylonian history. Exodus is Egyptian mixed with other traditions of the Hyksos etc. The conquest of Canaan was by the Sea People/Palestinians. David is Imaginary, Solomon is the Greek lawgiver Solon mixed with an Egyptian pharaoh and others. Daniel is purely Babylonian and so on.</p><p>Jerry: No I am not saying Jews are different I'm just saying that the Biblical stories are from other people and borrowed by the Jews. Borrowings by Babylonians and Accadians from the Sumerians are well attested to and that is not where the problem lie. The problem lie in faking a history trying to convince others it somehow makes you superior.</p><p>Kagenate: That is a blatant falsification, Manetho does not mention the Jews!</p><p>That is like saying Herodotus mentioned the Jews in his "Histories" but after the Christians removed the chapter they had added it is no longer there!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gnosisquest, post: 2733060, member: 697675"] Judaism had none? About 200 BCE (BC) Berossus wrote "Babylonica", Manetho wrote the Egyptian history and the Israelis supposedly translated their traditions into Greek. How do you feel about the people now that argue that this was done so these people could practice old customs and since the Jews had no history of their own the borrowed and transposed histories from Greeks, Egyptians, Babylonians, Hittites and others to be validated among the Greek Rulers? No, the history of the Jews is very scant, some aspects ore interwoven with other people's histories. Genesis is Babylonian history. Exodus is Egyptian mixed with other traditions of the Hyksos etc. The conquest of Canaan was by the Sea People/Palestinians. David is Imaginary, Solomon is the Greek lawgiver Solon mixed with an Egyptian pharaoh and others. Daniel is purely Babylonian and so on. Jerry: No I am not saying Jews are different I'm just saying that the Biblical stories are from other people and borrowed by the Jews. Borrowings by Babylonians and Accadians from the Sumerians are well attested to and that is not where the problem lie. The problem lie in faking a history trying to convince others it somehow makes you superior. Kagenate: That is a blatant falsification, Manetho does not mention the Jews! That is like saying Herodotus mentioned the Jews in his "Histories" but after the Christians removed the chapter they had added it is no longer there! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Name
Verification
Please enable JavaScript to continue.
Loading…
Post reply
Top