Israel Blockades Lebanon

The Taliban is losing. Yeah they "resurged" after hiding Pakistan where US and NATO forces can't go. Its not that they can't be beat.
 
That's sort of the point, you can't stomp out an organization like Hezbollah, Al'Quadi, Taliban etc...

They just leave the area and wait till your not watching and move back, unless you have a way of identifying a common person from a terrorist/criminal/etc.. then they will be able to blend into the populace at will.
 
exactly, if the Lebanese Army can secure the border against Zionist attacks then the armed wing of Hezbollah would no longer be needed.
 
fortunately for us, the FACT that those ambulances have airvents is not determined by who the site is biased towards. the FACT that the ambulances show absolutely no fire damage is also insensitive to the bias of the website.
 
All I see is some Zionists with an old white van that they have painted up, I will take my news from more credible sites thank you very much.

The lengths that these Zionists will go to in their attempts to hide the truth are hilarious.
 
They lost their relevance in 2000. why didn't they disappear? Becasue they recreated it. So it seems that is what your saying?

Israel would not have attacked Southern Lebanon if it wasn't for Hezbollah so is their relevance to provoak attacks?
 
No, that isn't what I've said at all and I think you realise that.

Hezbollah have said recently that they will not disband because the Lebanese army is not strong enough to repel an invasion from Israel. That is their purpose, their sole stated purpose. After 2000 they were no longer fighting Israel, so why did they continue to exist? They weren't needed, the public didn't need them anymore, but they stayed on because of a perceived threat to Lebanon. This threat had failed to materialise into anything, so like many groups have done in the past they tried to legitimise their operations by entering politics, this kept them in the publics field of view but didn't really open them up to much criticism from outside because they were democratically elected.

Then all of a sudden Hezbollah sent a raid into Israel capturing 2 Israeli soldiers knowing full well that Israel is particularly precious about its military personnel. All of a sudden Israeli combat aircraft are killing Lebanese children and the public are calling on Hezbollah to start fighting again, which they did.

Hezbollah repel the invaders for a second time and become the heroes once more.

Its a cycle. I dont expect Hezbollah to do anything to damage this ceasefire (beyond rearming etc) because they have done what they needed to do to secure their future for the next few years. They will continue to build up their numbers then they will probably do something to start another conflict assuming Israel dont start it for them.
 
So your admitting that Hezbollah started this conflict.



I realize its hard for you to understand Israel does not target children on purpose. Israel target Hezbollah who his in civilan areas. Israel releasd thousand of fliers warning of upcoming attacks. Israel wants a secure Norther border. That is what Israel wants. Every Israeli incursion into lebanon was based on achieving a secure Norther border.



So you don't expect to break the ceasefire except to break the most important part of it. Hmm
 
Nowhere in that resolution does it state that the cessation of hostilities was conditional on Hezbollah disarming or not rearming. The cessation of hostilities stated that Israel should stop its offensive operations (which is hasn't honoured) and Hezbollah should stop its rocket attacks on Israel, which unless you know something I dont, they have.
 
Actually it does. It is in the current one and it was in the 2000 resolution. You find a link to the text and it will be there. Israel has honored their obligations. Sorry but that is the truth. Hezbollah is supposed to disarm 2x.
 
The resolution on the current cessation of hostilities



The resolution on conditions necessary for a lasting peace



Its best you read the source before using it as a point in an argument.
 
Maybe I don't quite understand... the conditions for a permanent ceasefire, as you just quoted, explicitly calls for disarmament of militant groups in Lebanon
 
Read the bold post of what you posted. This was a conflict between Hezbollah and Israel. What armed groups could the ceasefire possibly be reffering to?
 
Those are conditions that the UN has stipulated need to be achieved for a lasting peace to exist. They have nothing to do with the current ceasefire, the conditions for the cessation of hostilities were for Hezbollah to stop its attacks and for Israel to stop its offensive operations.
 
Read the beginning of that quote, it is asking for them to support long term solutions. Long as in not short. They have nothing to do with the current ceasefire.
 
So you're basically saying it's irrelevant that Hezbollah is rearming in breech of the conditions for a permanent ceasefire, because they have adhered to the immediate condition that they stop launching rockets?


You're starting to sound like Sankaku
 
Oi leave me out of it.

If the Lebanese army and UN can secure the borders against illegal Zionist attacks then the military wing of Hezbollah is no longer needed. In the past the Lebanese Army has not been up to the job and Hezbollah stepped in to defend Lebanon against Zionist invaders.

As for Hezbollah rearming who knows, so far it is only Zionist speculation with no actual evidence. However I assume that the Zionist terror forces are rearming ?

So it only logical that Hezbollah do the same. Hezbollah will continue to exist as long as they are needed. Thus when Lebanon is strong with its army posted in southern Lebanon and with UN support to secure its borders and air space against Zionist attacks Hezbollah will no longer be needed.
 
no thats not what I'm saying and thats not what the resolution is saying.

The current cessation of hostilities is based around both sides stopping their attacks. That is everything it is based upon.

Further down the resolution it is asking both governments to support a long term solution by working towards the following conditions, one of which includes the disarming of any armed forces not under the direct coofftopicnd of the Lebanese government and another includes the removal of any foreign forces in the country without the permission of the Lebanese government. It is not asking for either government to do it NOW. Not even Israel expect Hezbollah to be disarmed today.
 
Back
Top