Man arrested for 2x4 labeled "High Powered Rifle"
Out of curiousity, I looked into something. The UK is very, very often cited as an example of how restrictive gun laws prevent gun crime. They passed restrictive gun laws in 1996 and they have only a few hundred firearms deaths each year, whereas the US has about 15,000 gun homicides per year (over 30,000 gun deaths per year, the majority of which are suicides), so people say restrictive gun laws create low gun homicide rates.
But if the UK's restrictive gun laws were responsible for their low gun deaths, you'd expect the UK to have a much higher rate of gun crime before the laws were passed, right? However, they didn't. In the two years before the restrictive gun laws were passed, the UK had 341 gun deaths and 358 gun deaths, respectively (including suicides and accidents as well as homicides). http://www.gun-control-network.org/GF07.htm Even the modest drop of ~100 deaths per year is likely due to a change in suicide methodology (the UK has about 4,000 suicides per year), not a significant change in homicide rates.
It doesn't appear that we can make ourselves like the UK crime-wise by emulating their gun laws, because we weren't like the UK before they implemented those laws. Whatever reason there is that murder is so much lower in the UK than the US, it isn't because of the UK's 1996 legislation.