Need to painlessly poison and kill my neighbor's dogs?

[Unregistered]

you guys are soo mean and cruel to kill an animal and just becuase a cat bit you does not mean you have to kil it. My cat bites me all the time and i dont wanna kill it do i.

Fuck you, that's you! If your cat bites me, I will kill it for sure.

 

[Unregistered]

My fucking neighbor's cats shit like crazy in my yard, I am hesitating to tell her in case she doesn't do anything, and I will be suspected if any of her cats goes wrong. What's the easiest way to kill them, or at least some of them?

 

[Unregistered]

Well it's New Year's Eve and what better time to rid yourself of that pesky barking dog? Go out and buy some serious-sized rockets and when the fireworks are under way in your city/town/village, fire one or two rockets at the offending barkbox, taking care not to be seen. Even if you don't kill it you'll surely do it some serious damage. The neighbour may well kick up a fuss but s/he can't prove that it wasn't a stray firework from the general display that reduced darling little poochie to a frazzle.

A happy and bark-free New Year to you all.

 

[Unregistered]

Fuck you

 

[Dogs_Suck]

You need to take a sponge and use rubber bands to compress it into a small ball. Mix it in food or soak in blood with food. Once the dog eats the food and that compressed sponge the rubber bands will break and the sponge will expand. The dog will not die right away, but it will give it time to die at your neighbors house and not yours. Nobody will know how it died. Dogs are a nuisence and if they run and bother people they should die. To all the tree hugging PETA S--T head kiss my butt I have killed many this way. You leave me a bad coment on this and I will kill 10 more just because you pissed me off.

OMG it works!!
I read this the other day, and I tried it with the juices from the bottom of a 'stake pack'..
Got a kitchen sponge and soaked it then tied it up real tight with a couple of rubber bands..
The dog is dead, I put them over the fence late at night so the dog would not be 'disturbed' until morning.
This afternoon I watched the neighbours carry on about their dumb dead Dog!! yes!!!

I am going to make a heap of these and spread them around the whole neighbourhood, hopefully start to get of some of these dumb ass-hole of an animals..

 

[Unregistered]

OMG it works!!
I read this the other day, and I tried it with the juices from the bottom of a 'stake pack'..
Got a kitchen sponge and soaked it then tied it up real tight with a couple of rubber bands..
The dog is dead, I put them over the fence late at night so the dog would not be 'disturbed' until morning.
This afternoon I watched the neighbours carry on about their dumb dead Dog!! yes!!!

I am going to make a heap of these and spread them around the whole neighbourhood, hopefully start to get of some of these dumb ass-hole of an animals..

Well done mate and enjoy the new, long awaited quiet! Must try it myself...

 

[Unregistered]

This thread is AWEOME! I especially loved the "Marine Sergeant" treehugging hippie fuck who wants to fuck us up the ass. Yeah right: "if I fuck a guy up the ass, HE'S the faggot, not me!" The Corps is full of these repressed gayboys and that's a stone fact.

Anyway congrats to those who got their nuisance dogs killed, and let all the dickless personality-deprived pukes go to hell with their pets. Over the Rainbow Bridge with you all, assholes!

 

[Unregistered]

C.S.I. Canine Unit?

You dumbass! Don't you think the owners are going to wonder why their dog is dead? Don't you think they are going to take it to the vet to find out? Don't you think the vet is gonna run toxicology reports (simple blood test) and see an amazing amount of sleeping pills? Don't you think they are going to suspect poision at that point? They are completely and totally aware that it is usually ALWAYS the neighbors who poision the animals? Don't you think they would check into it? Do you think you would be invisable? People, especially cops are not as stupid as you obviously think. And they do not need a pill bottle to determine whether they want to charge you with the felony. People, you really need to check your facts before posting to the internet. You crazy bastards.

I seriously doubt that Mac and his team are going to come knocking on my door here in Thailand; the feral dog capital of the world.

 

[Unregistered]

Humans are here to stay!

just to read these post about killing someones pets makes me sick. its more than wrong n cruel. Our family pet of 11 years was poisoned, and we had to put her to sleep her blood was black and she was suffering. its people like this that cause the world to be fucked up.

seriously what would happen if it was one of your loved ones poisoned just cause they were load or someone didnt like looking at their face.

Seriously? Well, to be serious, it happens every day, but not in the form you describe.

How does it happen?

It happens when irresponsible humans bring animals into the human living environment and allow those animals to infect, defecate, harass, frighten, maul, rip, tear, damage, kill, etc, anything that is the property or physical part of another innocent human.

To the anthropomorphic assholes who idolize their poochies; it is curious to read your noble threads that describe how you would murder another human being for simply removing from this earth a sub creature that is of no more use than a dripping faucet.

Killing them won't make things right? Well, letting them live is worse!

When an irresponsible owner acts surprised that their mutt was ended after being warned and after being subjected to weeks and weeks of angry and ugly stares by the neighbors, then it is the height of hypocrisy for them to complain; else these irresponsible owners are imbalanced and should rather move to the forest and take up a new life with the canis lupus.

Why should the innocent human beings have to be deprived of the existence that they have built for themselves, and be coerced into living a life without well-being, simply because of what this thread describes?

As most of the animal defense responses on this thread describe a behavior similar to the dogs we are all wanting to get rid of (I'll kill you if you hurt my dog - I'll mess you up - I'll rape your mother, and ad nauseum) then I think it perfectly normal for us to move forward and begin to understand the minds of these people who place the existence of a sub creature over that of a human being: That being the owners and protectors of these feral, deranges sub creatures are themselves feral and sub human; willing to go to any extend to prove their point that animals are lovely creatures and you better agree with them or else.

It is essentially what they are thinking, "I know I have a sub creature that irritates the hell out of everyone. I know this animal will do every sordid act against other human beings, especially defenseless children who do not know enough to stay away from a dog or playfully try to hug it or tug on its ears when in public and the animal is unleashed and straying. I know these things, and yet I do not care enough to do anything about it". It certainly must be that you do not care, otherwise, it is that you allow this scenario with a premeditated subconscious, and hence are imbalanced and not fit to be the caretaker of such a sub creature. Did you leave your parking brake off and let it roll down the hill and take out a family out for a stroll? Thank the devil for insurance so you can sleep at night.

But here's the deal; in Thailand, the remedies of being "nice" and trying to work out things and make friends withe the owners and beasts are fruitless. Perhaps it is my own character defect, but I will not submit to the notion of succumbing to the dog mafia and fucked up animist Thai thinking while living in stress and fear that some day I will receive a telephone call from my wife that my toddler son was out on his tricycle and was mauled by a dog that one of the fucked up Thais did not take responsibility for. Believe me, this is the case in this animist society. No one gives a damn about my son but all Hell breaks loose when I threaten an owner that his or her dog will die if they don't take preventative measures before the event.

Do I want to play a crap game with my wife's or son's life? Do the math!

So, what I suggest is to decide what you are going to do, then then do it. Dispense with any warnings or alerting anyone that you are upset, and do what you are going to do.

People who do that which improves the well being of human society always will be seen as evil by those who stay in the foxholes and let others go down Hell's path. It is in times of peace that the cowards and imbalanced people affect laws that subject decent people to seemingly absurd and illogical behavioral changes not meant for normal and well adjusted people. It is like the hysterical nagging bitch wife who finally makes her husband blow out and suddenly she gets calm and collected now that she has her husband going ballistic.

No matter what is said on this thread, dogs will die, and it will not be a natural death.

So please be careful when you discriminate against people who seek a solution and bring up the issue of murdering another human being for threatening to take out a feral nuisance. It does not suit your cause, and merely lends more credence to the issue of making the dripping faucet stop because the owner is too lazy and the plumber doesn't give a damn.

I see the recipes on this thread as a means to a peaceable end. Again; don't act surprised when it happens to your yapping, virulent, biting, or murdering poochie; even if you are not home to bear witness of the act; and merely there in time to see it in its retching death throws.

You've been warned! It is as simple as that. We aren't asking you to do anything that any responsible pet owner would not do. We are simply saying that we will not bow down to the level of the animals and live like them or give in to accepting their behavior as a way of life.

Now feel free to threaten my life or call me names, because I am willing to lose my life to protect my family from any threat to their personal safety or well being. That, I believe is a noble thing.

 

[Unregistered]

Your a fucking sick cunt you stupid piece of shit how about we get some rat posion and shove it up your ASSHOLE you sick freak. P.s. Kill your cats cause their feral freaks and I'll tortue you till your dead fucked up mole head..

No! You will not!

Now...

Go to your room and lay by your dish!

 

[Unregistered]

RE: Post 549: Very true and beautifully written. I fear, though, that your words of wisdom will be wasted on those it's aimed at - those morons are incapable of anything more than obscenities and illiterate threats, and won't understand words like "anthropomorphic". Full marks for making the point so eloquently though.

 

[Unregistered]

RE: Post 549: Very true and beautifully written. I fear, though, that your words of wisdom will be wasted on those it's aimed at - those morons are incapable of anything more than obscenities and illiterate threats, and won't understand words like "anthropomorphic". Full marks for making the point so eloquently though.

Thank you for the thoughts.

Yes! I understand what you said about people not changing, yet it all comes down to the situation and the people involved, or those who should be involved but don't get involved until someone lashes back.

One thing I did not mention is that I was merely spouting off about things that make up my character, and that will never change. So, to state my views at the wall is a good way to keep my thoughts and views sharp.

The government is most to blame, with the so-called owners coming in a close second. Neither takes a positive hand in dealing with an issue like this until the real sufferer is all fed up.

It's too easy to bring home an animal and be an instant owner without instead there being some kind of gauntlet to go through first. A good one would be to have all the neighbors sign a petition allowing the pet to be brought home, and the owner-to-be demonstrating that they will be able to meet the demands of the neighbors.

Having babies and bringing home pets and dumping them on the doorstep of society is an issue that too many cowards won't face. Unfortunately, most of the cowards make the laws and bring these babies and animals into our lives and do not tend to them with an eye towards their neighbors.

No. It's just too easy to be an unconsciousness asshole and a coward in this life and get away with it by hiding behind a false veil of ignorance and innocence when the truth hits the fan.

I'll just deal with it on a case by case basis. Both sides are equally correct and incorrect in their objective views, but I submit that each case is individual and unique to the people involved.

Again, I can't stop people from disagreeing with my views, but then those people can't stop people like me from reacting when idiots have become apathetic and insensitive towards the "village" or neighbors around them. People lived before there were police and animal control, and I never read any historical references of any substantial worth about angry owners that found there mutt dead. That's because people got along back then because if they did not they felt the pain from their neighbors.

Today is the age of rights, and it is easier to pick on the law abiding citizens and fuck their lives up rather than going after those whose lives are already FUBAR. These idiots consider it just another day to be told by a neighbor, a police officer, an animal control official, etc. to quiet and contain their animal. That is their version of normal.

Well, as I said, don't act surprised when it happens after you saw all the writing on the wall. You brought the fucking yapper and biter into my life without asking me, and I'll take it right our without asking you. Using your property as a defense is about as stupid as smoking laws. "You can't smoke here!" People worry more about where smoke travels than they do about a dogs continuous sounding bark and where the dog happens to be.

No! Just do what you are going to do and shut up about it and live with it.

 

[Unregistered]

One solution would be the introduction of a dog license similar to a driving licence. There used to be one in Britain but its administration was a shambles and it was abolished on the grounds of impracticality. It should be much easier to administrate these days with modern technology. The idea is that an officially verified complaint of a dangerous or continually noisy dog would net the owner a fine and points on the licence - and when the owner has reached a certain number of points, he or she would be banned from keeping a dog for a fixed period (one year, two years).

One flaw, as any British motorist will tell you, is that the analogous penalty scheme for driving is abused by the authorities who treat it as a source of revenue. I don't know if it is the same in America, but in Britain I wouldn't put it past the authorities to try to catch out dog owners who generally do keep their animals check in order to net a few quid. So the fine system ideally would be linked to the cost of administration and not profit-making, and I'm sure many taxpayers wouldn't mind their taxes being spent on this if it means they can sleep in peace at night.

Ultimately it would be the points and the possibility of a ban that would make most dog owners think twice about allowing their animals to cause noise pollution. Obviously a scheme like this would need to be refined and improved to weed out potential flaws and abuses, but I for one would be delighted to see something like this in place. In the end it would be beneficial to the dog owners too - if people knew that nuisance barking was being dealt with by the law, they would be far less likely to think about poisoning the dogs.

 

[Unregistered]

Responsibility

One solution would be the introduction of a dog license similar to a driving licence. There used to be one in Britain but its administration was a shambles and it was abolished on the grounds of impracticality. It should be much easier to administrate these days with modern technology. The idea is that an officially verified complaint of a dangerous or continually noisy dog would net the owner a fine and points on the licence - and when the owner has reached a certain number of points, he or she would be banned from keeping a dog for a fixed period (one year, two years).

One flaw, as any British motorist will tell you, is that the analogous penalty scheme for driving is abused by the authorities who treat it as a source of revenue. I don't know if it is the same in America, but in Britain I wouldn't put it past the authorities to try to catch out dog owners who generally do keep their animals check in order to net a few quid. So the fine system ideally would be linked to the cost of administration and not profit-making, and I'm sure many taxpayers wouldn't mind their taxes being spent on this if it means they can sleep in peace at night.

Ultimately it would be the points and the possibility of a ban that would make most dog owners think twice about allowing their animals to cause noise pollution. Obviously a scheme like this would need to be refined and improved to weed out potential flaws and abuses, but I for one would be delighted to see something like this in place. In the end it would be beneficial to the dog owners too - if people knew that nuisance barking was being dealt with by the law, they would be far less likely to think about poisoning the dogs.

In theory this is a reasonable suggestion; in theory!

Responsibility is a force that will jump from one who is apathetic to a cause, and land in the lap of one who is more serious towards that cause!

With responsibility comes action!

Example:

If a so-called owner will not take the necessary steps to maintain a happy balance between the behavior of his or her possession, as it relates to the surrounding environment and the occupants of that environment, then it falls onto the duty and responsibility of the occupants of that surrounding environment to bring the possession into balance themselves; or, to simply limit or completely remove the so-called owner's right to possess or retain that possession, respectively, by whatever means available.

In this case, regrettably, when ignorance prevails, then desperation becomes a means!

 

[Unregistered]

In theory this is a reasonable suggestion; in theory!

Responsibility is a force that will jump from one who is apathetic to a cause, and land in the lap of one who is more serious towards that cause!

With responsibility comes action!

Example:

If a so-called owner will not take the necessary steps to maintain a happy balance between the behavior of his or her possession, as it relates to the surrounding environment and the occupants of that environment, then it falls onto the duty and responsibility of the occupants of that surrounding environment to bring the possession into balance themselves; or, to simply limit or completely remove the so-called owner's right to possess or retain that possession, respectively, by whatever means available.

In this case, regrettably, when ignorance prevails, then desperation becomes a means!

Agreed. I suggested the solution above as a real answer to the problem, one which could be made to work if time and effort were spent on it.

Unfortunately, I can't see it happening in the UK or Europe any time soon, and from what I've read here the US too - so that's why we're reduced to throwing poisoned meat over that fence.

It's ugly, unethical and probably immoral - but under the present circumstances I understand exactly why a desperate neighbour has to poison a nuisance dog to get peace and quiet, and if I had the money I would pay for each and every one of the barking victims' legal defence when they finally snap and eliminate the noise pollution at source.

 

[Unregistered]

Funny I just search on how to kill my dog and found this big antifreeze soaked rubber band sponge ball of fun!

 

[Unregistered]

To the person killing the dog: if you have evidence you contacted animal control AND have called the police (they might not do anything, be warned) after you poison the dog, if someone finds out you did it, and you present the evidence that you tried to solve the problem peacefully, you probably won't have much trouble. Maybe a slap on the wrist, and a small fine, but absolutely nothing big.
To the person trying to kill the cat they pet: well, it's your own damn fault you were petting an unknown animal. You have no right to kill it.

Killing a dog is forgivable: there are millions of dog attacks each year, some on babies and small children. Killing a cat is another thing: they won't "attack" unless provoked and their attack is small and defensive, usually a warning bite or scratch, and then they walk away.
Remember this- cats domesticated themselves. Dogs were FORCED to be pets, and still have a wild nature. A dog will attack "because it feels like it", it's in their nature. What if one attacked YOUR baby or small child, or even you? The crime would be to keep the monster alive.

 

[Unregistered]

To the person killing the dog: if you have evidence you contacted animal control AND have called the police (they might not do anything, be warned) after you poison the dog, if someone finds out you did it, and you present the evidence that you tried to solve the problem peacefully, you probably won't have much trouble. Maybe a slap on the wrist, and a small fine, but absolutely nothing big.
To the person trying to kill the cat they pet: well, it's your own damn fault you were petting an unknown animal. You have no right to kill it.

Killing a dog is forgivable: there are millions of dog attacks each year, some on babies and small children. Killing a cat is another thing: they won't "attack" unless provoked and their attack is small and defensive, usually a warning bite or scratch, and then they walk away.
Remember this- cats domesticated themselves. Dogs were FORCED to be pets, and still have a wild nature. A dog will attack "because it feels like it", it's in their nature. What if one attacked YOUR baby or small child, or even you? The crime would be to keep the monster alive.

You make some excellent points but I don't think that going to the authorities and then poisoning an annoying dog is a good idea at all. You may be right that a good defence lawyer should be able to show that you were desperate and get you a lenient sentence, but your problems won't end with the law. The press will seize the story, and before you can say "woof woof" there will be people in discussion forums suggesting that you be tortured to death and other lovely things. Check out some of the reports of dog poisonings in the press online (most of them are from the States) and you'll see the violent, over-the-top reactions to these stories. Anyone who sticks his/her head above the parapet to sympathise with the noise victim gets threats and abuse too.

In Britain a silly woman who picked up a cat and put it in a wheelie bin (without harming it) had a Facebook page devoted to her - death threats and such kind sentiments as "I hope you get cancer." No doubt most of these sad individuals are cowards who like to talk big on the Internet, but you never know. In other words, if you poison a dog after making official complaints, you identify yourself as the chief suspect, and even if you get away with a slap on the wrist you won't be able to enjoy the quiet, as you will quite likely have paid the price of your personal security.

I came to this site as a neighbour's yapping dog drives me nuts and I have been on the verge of getting rid of it several times, but I always stop myself as I complained to the stupid, selfish owner a while ago and have made it obvious that I hate that dog. I believe that the victims of noisy or dangerous dogs have to decide early on what they want to do. They can go down the complain-to-neighbour/police/animal control/courts route, or they can say nothing, plan carefully and when the opportunity presents itself, poison the dog. But they can't do both. I wish that I'd read this discussion before complaining - in retrospect I should probably have gone for the second option, but I can't now.

To finish (at last!) I'd say that if you decide to kill the dog, you must make sure you don't talk about the barking to ANYONE. Otherwise someone at work who resents you, for example, may hear about the poisoning and report you. It's not easy I know, but if you have people round and they comment on the noise, you need to pretend that you can sleep through anything and it doesn't bother you. That keeps you from suspicion and prepares you for the big one if the police come round and ask questions - it'll be a lot easier to be convincing when you say "Yeah, I did hear it barking sometimes but it wasn't a problem."

PS I've ordered one of those ultrasonic thingies from Amazon that's supposed to shut dogs up. I'm not very confident but I'll report back if it works.

 

[Unregistered]

You sick fuck

Fuck you, You shit fuck go to fuckin hell my dog was killed this wauy cause of some sick fucked in the head like you. hope you go to hell and die see how that feels. FUCK YOU

 

[Unregistered]

All of you need to go to fucking hell you pieces of shit