NFLs top 100... Roger Staubach at #46?? You have to be kidding.?

B

Bobby

Member
Joined
May 16, 2008
Messages
430
Reaction score
0
Points
16
I can't believe they put Staubach lower than marino, elway, favre, or manning. Staubach is so much better than any of those guys that it's not even funny.

P.S. I'm not a Cowboys fan. I'm a Pats fan.
 
Actually, to me it was more shocking to see Bart Starr ranked 51. They guy was 9-1 in postseason, won 5 rings and was named all decade. If we could name a player Mr. Packer it would be him and not Favre.
 
Actually, to me it was more shocking to see Bart Starr ranked 51. They guy was 9-1 in postseason, won 5 rings and was named all decade. If we could name a player Mr. Packer it would be him and not Favre.
 
Naw...I love Roger, but John Had a stronger arm....Marino was a buch better passer, Manning is flat out better, but less athletic....He maybe better than farve. Roger was great and he would be in my top 20 but not ahead of the three i named
 
Staubach is the best ever. He used to always be in the top 5, but history hasn't been kind to him. He was better than Montana.
 
Actually, to me it was more shocking to see Bart Starr ranked 51. They guy was 9-1 in postseason, won 5 rings and was named all decade. If we could name a player Mr. Packer it would be him and not Favre.
 
Staubach is the best ever. He used to always be in the top 5, but history hasn't been kind to him. He was better than Montana.
 
his numbers would of been better if he hadnt gone to war for this country.
 
Back
Top