Yes, I referred to them as vermin; I also freely admited to being prejudiced against them. However, I never advocated their slaughter. I said that if the Israelis slaughtered them I wouldn't bat an eyelash. Palestinian attrocities have rendered me incapable of any compassion for them or their cause.
Either way, bigoted or not, that doesn't change the fact that what I've said about the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and the overall goal of the Jihadists is still true. Martin Luther King was an adulterer who imbezzeled millions from the Rainbow Coalition; that doesn't mean that what he was saying about the conditions of Civil Rights in America wasn't true. My bias against the Palestinians doesn't alter the facts one bit. What's telling is no one who disagrees with me is willing to offer anything beyond slander to counter my accusations against the Palestinians. Surely, if my 'bigoted' opinion was so wrong someone could find some empirical evidence to prove it. I just rattled off a dozen or so books that back my opinion of the Palestinian situation. Am I the only one debating this that actually reads the scholarly work being done?
Either way, bigoted or not, that doesn't change the fact that what I've said about the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, and the overall goal of the Jihadists is still true. Martin Luther King was an adulterer who imbezzeled millions from the Rainbow Coalition; that doesn't mean that what he was saying about the conditions of Civil Rights in America wasn't true. My bias against the Palestinians doesn't alter the facts one bit. What's telling is no one who disagrees with me is willing to offer anything beyond slander to counter my accusations against the Palestinians. Surely, if my 'bigoted' opinion was so wrong someone could find some empirical evidence to prove it. I just rattled off a dozen or so books that back my opinion of the Palestinian situation. Am I the only one debating this that actually reads the scholarly work being done?