They are against government control of healthcare because they think private companies will do a better job
They are against the government option of insurance because they say that private insurers cannot compete with the government
So, which one is it? If private insurance companies cannot compete with the government then that is saying that the government plan is providing a more cost effective option. If private insurance companies are going to do a better job then why can't they compete withh the government?
They are against the government option of insurance because they say that private insurers cannot compete with the government
So, which one is it? If private insurance companies cannot compete with the government then that is saying that the government plan is providing a more cost effective option. If private insurance companies are going to do a better job then why can't they compete withh the government?