TheJoyousHedonist
New member
- Dec 1, 2010
- 4
- 0
- 1
Since (psychologically healthy) humans have a drive towards happiness and any ethical concept based on anything but pleasure and pain and sustainable happiness is superfluous, I cannot comprehend why homosexuality would be morally wrong if it doesn't have any negative effects on anybody.
Can somebody explain to me why homosexuality would be wrong if it doesn't have any negative effects whatsoever to either the people exercising it or anybody else in society?
(Just don't say it isn't natural, because homosexuality is common in the animal kingdom. Personally I wouldn't even say that ''it's unnatural'' is a valid argument in any context.)
Can somebody explain to me why homosexuality would be wrong if it doesn't have any negative effects whatsoever to either the people exercising it or anybody else in society?
(Just don't say it isn't natural, because homosexuality is common in the animal kingdom. Personally I wouldn't even say that ''it's unnatural'' is a valid argument in any context.)