G
geek
Guest
Second, Shafer never explains why, but he implies that reporters have some special weakness for Apple. Reporters certainly lean toward certain topics. Apple, since many writers use Macs and identify as the creative professionals to whom Steve Jobs speaks, is one of them. But they also love writing about other topics, such as themselves, which is why the media is full of so much self-referential media criticism. The only difference: Apple stories are popular. As Shafer will no doubt discover from the pageview stats on his Apple takedown, Apple product launches are the one guaranteed source of web traffic apart from a celebrity's nipple slip. At Gawker Media, our director of engineering's big annual test is the Macworld presentation by Apple's founder, every January. It is the internet's equivalent of the TV Superbowl. And reporters, even if they do so with personal enthusiasm, can hardly be blamed for serving their readers.
Third, press coverage for the iPhone is actually not that unprecedented. To be sure, Nexis shows 2,000 articles about Apple's miraculous new cellphone this month already, a total which I'd expect to see hit 5,000 by the end of next week. The phone already had a burst of publicity after it was first announced in January. In total, the iPhone's will have appeared in about 15,000 major newspaper articles -- before it's even available for sale. That is, unless someone corrects me, the biggest wave of pre-launch press, for any new release, ever. But it's not an order of magnitude more. Nintendo's gaming remote, the Wii, got nearly as much attention when it first went on sale, last November. See the chart.
[IMG]http://feeds.gawker.com/~a/valleywag/full?i=re2gOv[/IMG]
More...