Uncircumsized...

you become more aware of you senses because you rely on them more. they dont get better.

When you get circ'd you lose thousands of nerve endings. they are gone.
 
if the girl is not a lesbo i think she will take anything that goes into her lol
 
But...your Jewish...Isn't it a big thing in your religion to be circumcised? (Pardon my ignorance if I am wrong.) But I think I learned it was a sign that you were "God's chosen people"?
 
.

Guys care about how their penis looks and the length of it more than girls do. Likewise, vagina comes in many different forms and if you have room to complain you obviously have never had a dry spell and recieve too much pussy beyond belief.
 
That study was never completed because they thought it was too risky to continue, you know, with all the AIDS and other STIs. But they don't say it in their article, of course. Obviously, you are just yet another ignorant prick without all the facts.



It does.



Too late



Again, too late. I win.
 
Oh sorry for not respecting your racial differences; heres an American study for you to read further on.



Well i cannot help such an ignorant fuck if he would rather be an asshat than look at the facts.



Oh man, you can just magically sense carriers of STD's? Sounds like the gene pool will end up cleaning out such a dumbass as yourself.



At least I go out and research my info to post instead of being quick on the draw to hand out insults and giving out no valuable info.
 
If evolution hasn't gotten rid of it, I'm happy to still have it. No need to fuck with nature.
 
Its a 50/50 argument, because some people will be circumcised and some wont. Being one or the other isnt a bad thing. While not being cut can have some risks nowdays, the only reason people are is a mundane choice made by the parents. If you do get cut, so be it, there is absolutely nothing bad anyone can say about it- if it wasnt such a practiced medical procedure that over 30% of the worlds population has it done, i doubt you can find evidence as to why it shouldnt be.

-Josh
 
The mere fact that posters in this thread (whether circumcised or not), so vehemently argue for or against such a practice, is idiotic. Why should anyone here care about what another dude's dick looks like? Unless you're having trouble with the ladies, I'd say it should be a non-discussed issue.

Neither is better than the other... Although, one cannot be undone.
 
Ok, I just want to know in your experienced opinion, notice the EXPERIENCED part, why a guy who has an uncut dick, knows his STDs do's and dont's and washes often will have a bigger chance of screwing up his dick?

You can be cut/uncut and screw a clean girl without a rubber but I guarantee you this, you will catch something off a girl who is dirty with both.

I got a head on mine and it doesn't need a crash helmet thanks.
 
True, all I said is that an uncut person runs a bit higher chance of contracting something- which is exactly what has been indicated by numerous studies/surveys. Also, its not that I know anymore about the subject than the next person, its just I take the time to look up useful info before I post.

p.s.-I am circumcised btw.
 
Just go to the church and tell the priest to take off your skin condom. I'm sure he'd be more than happy :tup:
 
You can certainly get back most of any foreskin that has been removed by stretching... look into that.

I care about guys that are uncut because I don't want a monster trying to get on my daughter. Get your junk cleaned up and pretty
 
Back
Top