WHICH ONE OF THE CELL PHONES IS BETTER? NOKIA 3500 or MOTO RAZR V3i?

  • Thread starter Thread starter footballfan
  • Start date Start date
I would go for the RAZR V3i. I'm not normally a massive fan of Motorola but that phone is one of the better ones. Nokia 3500 only has a tiny 128 x 160 screen which is very small compared to the V3i's 176 x 220. The Nokia's specs are slightly better, though as it has a 2mpx cam and FM radio. Also, the V3i is a flip and the 3500 is a bar, so it depends on what you prefer.
 
nokia is a better built quality phone no matter the model. the razr series is complete utter garbage
 
Both are good phones. But if you prefer a good camera then nokia 3500 is a good choice(2 mpx camera) and it takes pictures in 1600x1200 pixels which is very good. And it also has 8x zoom. It has bluetooth v 2.0 + EDR + A2DP. It's GPRS enabled + EDGE enabled(faster browsing appx 236.8 kbps). It has a mini USB slot. Extendable up 2 GB(As far as i know). It's VOIP Enabled!! It's a superb phone at an affordable price. Whereas Motorazr V3i is not good compared to 3500 classic. It has a 1.23 Megapixel camera and takes pictures in the resolution 1280x960. It doesn't have EDGE. It's extendable only up to 512 MB (which is less if you ask me). It doesn't have a long battery life compared to 3500. But the design of Motorazr V3i is nice compared to nokia 3500. But design doesn't matter most here. It's all about the features. Motorazr V3i is a very old phone and nokia 3500 is a new phone. So i recommend you buy a nokia 3500 instead of Motorazr V3i. Hope this helps!!
 
Back
Top