Man's history doesn't so long. men took charge his food, but women took charge her baby in prehistory. like that, the role of men and women has differed each other. well, which sex ruled such small society actually. i could not but doubt that any sex is master or slave. considering differently,
women is like master and men is slave in prehistory. because ancient society was agrarian society.
so, ancient society could not need numbers of popularity. after all, because women took charge her birth, i don''t good feel about this, women is like ruler. that why was mother center - society.
of course, others can exist to think differently, in comparison with modern society.
but, the politic system of a nation has transformed from Mother-society to Father-society.
these outcomes resulted in the development of modern science. because the system of production changed. in other words, machinery has replaced the system of women's production little by little.
at any rate, in modern society, Man is master. that main reason seems for science to substitute many roles of women.
indeed, could my such insistence be too radical?
but that doesn't mean i deny the main role of Women.
Because Man is not the slave of circurmstance, but the master of surroundings.
anyone can disapprove this truth.
Please, Women, don't hate me,
Man is the master of Nature?
women is like master and men is slave in prehistory. because ancient society was agrarian society.
so, ancient society could not need numbers of popularity. after all, because women took charge her birth, i don''t good feel about this, women is like ruler. that why was mother center - society.
of course, others can exist to think differently, in comparison with modern society.
but, the politic system of a nation has transformed from Mother-society to Father-society.
these outcomes resulted in the development of modern science. because the system of production changed. in other words, machinery has replaced the system of women's production little by little.
at any rate, in modern society, Man is master. that main reason seems for science to substitute many roles of women.
indeed, could my such insistence be too radical?
but that doesn't mean i deny the main role of Women.
Because Man is not the slave of circurmstance, but the master of surroundings.
anyone can disapprove this truth.
Please, Women, don't hate me,
Man is the master of Nature?